Qualification for the design and manufacture of special equipment
Thread Content
The set of ammonia decomposition equipment that our company plans to purchase falls under the category of special equipment, as its outlet pressure is 0.2 MPa. One subcontractor does not have the qualifications required for the design and manufacture of special equipment; they plan to engage a manufacturer outside that possesses such qualifications to carry out the design and manufacturing work, and after that they will provide us with the relevant qualification documents. Is this acceptable? Where can I find the relevant legal regulations? Because they are working for foreigners, those people don’t believe such permits exist; they think that the manufacturing unit doesn’t have the necessary qualifications to design and produce products, so how can it use someone else’s permits? Insisting on looking for relevant legal provisions seems like nonsense; I couldn’t find in the Regulations on the Safety Supervision of Special Equipment any explicit provisions stating whether it is permissible for companies to borrow each other’s qualifications and then sell them to clients. This post was last edited by Yibingshi on 2009-3-16 13:29.]
Response to the LZ question: 1. Pressure vessel manufacturers must possess the appropriate manufacturing licenses and must not operate beyond the scope permitted by those licenses. According to the relevant provisions, Articles 2, 6, and 14 of the \"Measures for the Supervision and Management of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Manufacturing\", manufacturing units of pressure vessels that hold permits are also not allowed to lend out their \"Manufacturing Licenses\". According to Article 17, Paragraph 3 of the Regulations on the Supervision and Management of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Manufacturing, if a subcontractor possesses design qualifications but no manufacturing license, and entrusts the production of the vessels to a qualified (i.e., licensed) manufacturing factory, that factory shall issue relevant quality certification documents, inspection certificates, completion documents, etc ； It is fine to directly hand it over to the user unit (owner). It should be noted at this time that both the factory documentation of the container and the nameplate on the equipment must come from the manufacturing plant itself, and not from a subcontractor. This situation is not the lending of a manufacturing license, but rather subcontracting. 4. If the subcontractor lacks both design qualifications and manufacturing permits, then the container must be designed and manufactured by a manufacturer with design qualifications. For reference! This post was last edited by clguan on 2009-3-16 14:50]
What was said on the 3rd floor is absolutely correct. This situation is not only allowed but also a very common form. This helps to ensure clear division of tasks, and it also allows professional manufacturers to become more specialized. It avoids the phenomenon of a company being large and comprehensive yet weak as a result.