Equipment maintenance wastewater

For the sewage discharge network, I usually just use “wastewater network”; is there a problem with “it should be discharged” after that?

Following the suggestion from above, the translation is as follows: The site flushing wastewater and wastewater generated as a result of maintenance, which should be discharged into the plant’s wastewater system and not released outside the Battery Limit. Is this appropriate? This post was last edited by niulijun117 on 2009-3-16 at 16:00.]

Isn’t it more concise without relative clauses? The phrase “must not” that cannot be placed arbitrarily can be expressed as instead of or but not

The site flushing wastewater, washed wastewater, etc., resulting from maintenance, are discharged into the plant’s wastewater system rather than being released outside the battery limit. This is another way of translating it without using relative clauses; please feel free to give your feedback

It should not be discharged outside the Battery Limit – this sounds like Chinglish; in my opinion, it should be \"forbid to discharge whatsoever\".

The battery limit value has been set without any logical basis. Additionally, the two adjectives describing wastewater are in one -ing form and the other in -ed form (they should be consistent actually)； Using “caused by” here is also inappropriate: lol. It still doesn’t sound right as a translation, so let’s make a slight adjustment: Wastewater generated from equipment maintenance and similar activities, such as wastewater from tank cleaning, should be discharged into the plant’s sewage drainage system; it must not be released indiscriminately. Wastewater generated during equipment maintenance and inspection (as a precaution, in case allergies occur), such as floor cleaning and tank flushing/ rinsing, etc., must be directed into the sewage drainage system within the plant area; random discharge or disposal is not allowed.

I’ll make further changes. I’ve checked, and this section indeed misinterprets the original meaning; “wastewater that has not been treated must not be discharged outside the factory” means that untreated wastewater should not be released arbitrarily outside the premises. My latest changes are as follows: I’m still not sure about the underlined parts. However, in my previous experience, the term used for rinse water has always been “flush”. Waste water generated from equipment maintenance and other activities, such as wastewater from tank cleaning, should be discharged into the plant’s sewage drainage system; it must not be released indiscriminately. Wastewater generated during plant maintenance and inspection (such as site flushing and tank flushing, etc.) should be discharged into the plant’s sewage drainage system rather than being released outside the plant. :$ :lol Last edited by niulijun117 on 2009-3-18 10:04 ]

Regarding “site flushing wastewater”: why was “the site flushing wastewater” used earlier, but then was it changed to “floor”? This generally refers to outdoor floors (such as in pump areas); \"site\" is sufficient for this purpose, while \"floor\" tends to refer to indoor floors.

Regarding “equipment maintenance,” it is believed that if it refers to regular maintenance work, plant maintenance should be used； Turnaround is used for planned partial maintenance, while overhaul is used for major repairs of the entire installation. ““For tank cleaning,” use tank washing or tank cleaning; rinsing is not commonly used for cleaning equipment.

Was the comma before which removed as well? If you want to include it, remove both commas before and after the ‘such as’ phrase and use parentheses instead; otherwise there will be a problem. The wastewater generated during ....(such as site flushing and ....etc.) should be .....