Why are INTOUCH and KingView so similar?
Thread Content
Why does ConfigKing seem so similar to WONDERWARE INTOUCH? The similarity rate is around 90%, I guess. Real-time database, structured variables (super tags), tag types (memory real-time). . . . ), configuration methods, screen configuration approaches, etc.; even the names of the configuration applications are almost identical – it’s outright imitation!
Hehe, I used Intouch for my graduation project, and KingView for work; they are extremely similar. .
I used KingView for my graduation project. Later, because the two were quite similar, I also learned Intouch on my own. :lol
The following message is a rumor about the boss of a certain domestic configuration software; it’s impossible to verify whether it’s true or not. It was before 1994, I think. ComSoft’s colleague Lin Wei is the finest agent for Intouch in China. Later, due to the KingView Crack Intouch issue, Lin Wei had his status as an Intouch agent revoked. Subsequently, Lin established Yakong Company. Actually, Asia Control already had such qualifications before they were revoked; the reason for the revocation was that version 1.0 of Asia Control’s KingView had an interface that was over 90% similar to that of Intouch. Thereafter, until version V5.0, KingView aimed to catch up with Intouch. Starting from V6.0, more of its own elements were incorporated.
Intouch has a strong database, but I’m not sure about KingView’s database; there are big differences in price for the same number of points
KingView is likely to be the pioneer that first introduced the concept of imitation!
There are indeed many similarities!
Agree with the person on floor 5; it just looks similar. The JieKong looks similar to Fix, and it was developed in that style from the beginning