Thread Content
I am doing safety assessment, and I find that doing safety management in an enterprise is more meaningful than doing safety assessment. I don’t know if I am qualified. I welcome suggestions from friends who are doing safety management.
I feel that, relatively speaking, doing safety management work in an enterprise requires a certain understanding of all aspects related to safety such as the company's production processes, equipment, electrical, instrumentation, civil engineering, etc., and should be more professional.; When doing safety assessment, because there are many types of companies involved, and the processes, equipment, etc. are very different, it is impossible to be professional for every company, and the required knowledge should be broader. My personal opinion may not be correct, just a suggestion.
Personally, I feel that the relationship between line and surface is still the same. Management work is relatively cumbersome and all aspects must be considered.
I support the second floor’s opinion, but there are big differences between different companies and industries. Generally, few security assessors return to companies unless they are very good foreign companies.
You can consider it if you are in charge of safety in an enterprise or company. If you are a general manager, you don’t need to think about it. It is better to do safety assessment.
Do a good job in safety assessment. Nowadays, most people who work in safety management in enterprises hope to do safety assessment, so that their expertise can be used more effectively.
It's better to do security assessment, management is just a trivial matter
First: Responsibility! ! ! ! second: Professional technical knowledge, including: Process equipment, etc. third: keep learning * If you want to make some achievements with your spirit, in addition to the above three points, the support of the leadership is essential!
Doing a safety assessment also requires practical experience, and a purely theoretical safety assessment is useless. Doing safety management work requires comprehensive quality, including process knowledge, equipment knowledge, safety knowledge, safety regulations and other knowledge. It is difficult to really do a good job in safety management.
To do a safety assessment, you should be quite familiar with relevant safety knowledge and relevant laws and regulations, but doing safety management in an enterprise requires such personal conditions: First of all, you must be familiar with the knowledge of processes, equipment, etc. ; Secondly, you must have a sense of responsibility, not be afraid of offending others, and dare to be serious and tough in management. Finally, when it comes to safety management in an enterprise, social activities and living space are smaller and basically limited to the enterprise.
It’s better to do your safety assessment with peace of mind. If the safety management is not good, the people below will suffer the consequences and be blamed.
It is difficult to do safety management in an enterprise if the unit leader is not very supportive, and this position is useless. Let's do security assessment.
A purely theoretical security assessment without actual work experience is useless. Since you are doing security assessment, you must have had relevant work experience before. It is easier to get started in the same industry in an enterprise. However, it is better to do security assessment because there are fewer trivial things and there are fewer things to consider.
It's better to do safety assessment with peace of mind. Safety assessment is much better than safety management. This post was last edited by ldh525386 on 2009-3-19 15:59 ]
If you do a good job in safety assessment, you can make a lot of money without having to go to the workshop all the time. Safety management will be troublesome and it is easy to offend people. People are the most difficult to manage.
First of all, I will briefly describe my main experience as operator, craftsman, safety officer, production management, and technical management. Judging from my experience, what kind of job I engage in mainly varies from person to person and has a lot to do with the individual's personality, goals, environment, and personal value evaluation standards. As for your statement that doing safety management in an enterprise is more meaningful than doing safety assessment, I disagree with this view, because different people have different views and different situations have different situations. Because you have never done corporate security management, I will give you a general introduction to this aspect, and then you can make a comparison based on your own situation to determine whether you are competent and the direction of your future work efforts. As an enterprise safety manager, you must have: 1. First of all, you must have professional qualifications. You are currently a registered safety engineer. I believe you already have this. ; 2. You must have a thorough grasp of the company's processes, and your own safety skills must be excellent. ; 3. You must dare to arrest and manage, and you must not be afraid of offending others. At the same time, you must have good communication skills. ; 4. You must have good psychological quality and strong self-control ability. This mainly refers to emergency response to accidents. You must know that when an emergency occurs, safety management personnel must be in person to direct and handle the situation. ; 5. We must dare to take responsibility and know that the factors that affect safety are people's unsafe behavior, the unsafe operating status of things, and the soundness of the safety management system. However, people's unsafe behavior is more difficult to control. If something goes wrong, this is no joke. ; 6. Don't worry too much about financial income. As far as I know, the salary of most corporate safety managers is not very good, and they even dare not make more than the income of doing safety evaluation, so you must have this kind of mentality. It seems that in the above situation, you should consider it yourself! :lol