The device was completed and put into operation
Thread Content
original: After the device is completed and put into production, it should reach the performance indicators listed in Table ####. translation: After the plant constructed and start-up, the performance index should reach the required value listed in the Table. I feel that the tenses of construct and start-up are inconsistent, but I can't think of a suitable way to express it! !
Ask weakly: The direct expression is that the device is not finished until it is put into production. Doesn't it mean that it is almost completed.
go into operation
After the plant constructed and start-up. If after+non, constructed \start-Up is used as a subdivision adverbial, it is not the sequence of time, but the before and after of space. It is recommended to use clauses: After the plant is constructed and it goes into operation,~~.
I agree with the statement on the 2nd floor, it can be expressed directly in terms of production. After start-up, the plant should fulfill the performance requirement listed in the table.
Agree with the 5th floor, it is easier to express it directly as "put into production", but if you want to express the completion of a project, you can directly express it with CONSTRUCTION. You don't need to write PLANT, because you have the context~~~ And your START-UP is also a noun~ IMO This post is finally written by * Edited by aoguai607 on 2009-3-19 09:08 ]
After the device is completed and put into production, it should reach the performance indicators listed in Table ####. When the plant is completed and put into operation, the performance targets specified in table #### should be met.
Completed and put into operation: If it is a product, it can also be used. Put (go) into production can also be used.