Haichuan Machinery and Equipment Edition Scoring Standards and Moderator Assessment Methods HCJX 2009-001
Thread Content
a goal: Improve the quality of communication. Two basic points: Good topics enhance the taste of the section, and good replies attract members to participate. Haichuan Machinery and Equipment Edition Scoring Standards and Moderator Assessment Methods HCJX 2009-001 1. Scoring criteria 1. Topics that are very simple and can be read by flipping through a book, or even topics with mixed scores, will not be graded. If members feel satisfied, they can grade. 2. If the topic is more exciting and has more than 10 replies, the moderator will score 30 wealth (you can score the next day). Other moderators cannot rate. Membership ratings are encouraged on a voluntary basis. 3. The moderator's score for a more in-depth and exciting reply topic is 30-40 wealth or 3-4 charm. 4. The moderator's score for an average reply topic cannot exceed 5 wealth (5 points will be deducted for copies). You can appeal if you have any opinions, but if it is verified that the copy is indeed copied, the IP will be blocked. 2. Moderator management is a supporting measure. The number of moderators managed is still the basis for assessment. The weight of posts is increased to 1, and online is increased to 1. Good topics that moderators take the lead in posting to drive communication are also scored, and moderators rate each other. Additional advanced bonuses are provided by * Issued by moderator. The method is as before. Qualified Moderator: Good moderators with an activity index of over 300: Outstanding moderators with an activity index of over 400: Activity index above 500 (participate in advanced award distribution) This post was last edited by rgsmdqy on 2009-4-10 11:33 ]
I think if this is the case, shouldn’t moderators be more involved in publishing excellent topics and responding to excellent posts? Someone must actively promote this transitional stage. Moderators should take the lead. It is strongly recommended that moderators publish topics and reply to posts as part of the assessment criteria: lol
management standardization, learning* Got it! We will give strong support and work hard to move forward! ! !
If this is the case, does it mean that as long as one moderator gives a rating to a topic and a reply, the other moderators will not be able to rate it? In this case, some moderators will manage a lot of them, and some will be very few.
. Well, good idea. Just a reminder, the same reply from the same person in succession is usually caused by network delay. Just delete it without deducting points.
I am a non-professional and cannot participate in many discussions. It seems that I have to resign: funk: :funk: :'( :'( :'(
Adhere to one goal and two basic points. Actively implement Taoban's reform measures! Everyone moves forward courageously for a common goal!
When did this rule come into effect? Starting today?
The rating for replying to the topic is a bit too low. Can the rating be increased for good reply posts? Or no more than 1 Charisma or 15 Wealth?
This is indeed good, but my management number may be less.
There are so many people who copied and replied, and they got something for nothing. They copied people who clearly used their own experience to answer. Five deductions is too little, and it is not enough for ordinary people to get angry.
Can it be relaxed so that moderators can be free to take the initiative? For self-discipline. Another question is the same as the 8th floor. When will the rules be implemented? Is there a transition period?
Too comprehensive. I will do my best
Try to do it well! Do what I can for the forum!
This issue should be taken seriously. Replies to one's own work experience or one's own in-depth analysis should be encouraged with a high score to improve the quality of everyone's replies. If you just post a few words, you can get a lot of wealth, which is seriously detrimental to the development of the forum.
I have just joined the forum management, and I am not familiar with some things. It seems that I need to work hard to be a good moderator. Do your best.
Before becoming a moderator, my average number of posts was more than 6 per day. After becoming a moderator, my average number of posts was no more than 4 per day. This is because management takes up a lot of time. At the same time, I pay great attention to the quality of posts and do not post posts that are not in-depth. I also believe that the quality of posts by moderators needs to be an assessment point. After all, moderators serve as role models. I also agree that the moderator should take the lead in posting and encourage everyone to post. If there is no reply to the topic, first promote it and let everyone discuss it. Or if there is no reply, then take the lead and post a reply. ； Excellent topic posts are discussed with members. For simple ones with no questions and answers that can be found by reading a book, there is no need to reply. Just let everyone discuss. After all, the moderator is to guide everyone's discussion and manage the direction and quality of the discussion. At the same time, the post conforms to the standards. This is our management purpose. This post was last edited by vivo1314 on 2009-4-21 07:13 ]
I will work hard and strive to be the leader.
I'm here to learn too* study * , strive to do your job well
Understood, let’s work hard to build our home together and strive to be the leader!
Strive to do our job well and make Haichuan a learning place for everyone.* place!