HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Method for numbering welds

2009-03-25View Original

Thread Content

In production, weld numbering is an essential step. But how can it be done correctly to better meet the needs of production? Here are my personal views: Those who work in welding processes should be aware that quality assurance systems have specific rules and requirements regarding weld numbering. However, the numbering rules in many companies’ quality assurance systems are not very suitable for actual production. As we all know, the general principle is to number the welds from top to bottom, from left to right, from inside to outside, or in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction, as A1, A2, A3, A4, and so on. B1, B2, B3, B4------: first the cylinder body, then the nozzles, and finally the nozzles and flanges. However, this numbering method isn’t the best. As we all know, the cutting process in the workshop doesn’t always follow what’s specified in the process card. For example, the process card may indicate that the cylinder body consists of 3 sections, but to save material, the workshop might use 4 sections, or there might be two longitudinal seams on one section. If we use the previous welding seam numbering method, it would be necessary to renumber almost all of the welds, which is very troublesome and can lead to confusion. This also causes a lot of difficulties for inspectors. Everyone can take a look at this alternative numbering method: for the cylinder body, the welds can be numbered from top to bottom, from left to right, from inside to outside, or in a clockwise or counterclockwise direction. As for the welds on the nozzles and between the nozzles and flanges, they can be numbered according to the pipe identifier. For instance, the butt joint seam at pipe interface A can be called Ba; the seam where it is welded to the cylinder body can be called Da, and the seam where it is welded to the flange can be called Ca. In this way, even if the number of sections or longitudinal seams changes, it won’t affect the numbering of the welds. If anyone has a better numbering method, I’d like to hear it from you. This post was last edited by yaoyongyoyo on 2009-3-25 09:11
Reply #22009-03-25
Our numbering is as follows: End caps: F1A, F2A; Cylinder body: Longitudinal seams: A1, A2…… Circumferential seams: B1, B2….. Connectors: MA, MB for values greater than or equal to 250, HB for values less than or equal to 250
Reply #32009-03-25
Longitudinal welds use: A1-1, 2, 3….; A 2-1, 2, 3…. ; You might as well give it a try. :lol
Reply #42009-03-25
The method on the 4th floor can indeed resolve the discrepancy between theory and practice, but it’s still best for process engineers to communicate more with the workshop in order to better relate to reality.
Reply #52009-03-25
Method for marking welds.doc http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-46948-1-1.html

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.