Discussion: Feasibility of converting rammed coke ovens to top-loading coke ovens
Thread Content
Let’s discuss: Is it feasible to convert rammed coke ovens into top-charging coke ovens? Where are there successful cases?
Haven’t heard of it; give a reason for the modification
I haven’t heard of any modifications that involve replacing the ramming system with a different one; firstly, it’s not easy to work on coal towers. The rest are all a bit easier
First, a top-loading coal tower needs to be built. Second, a top-loading coal car must be installed.
I haven’t heard of any changes; it’s not very feasible, and it doesn’t help in expanding the sources of coking coal. The main issue lies with the coal towers, followed by the need to modify the coke pushers and the roof tracks, as well as the need to introduce new coal loading vehicles. Additionally, the too-small taper of the carbonization chamber makes it more difficult to use top-loading coke pushers. This post was last edited by goudan020 on 2009-3-26 at 20:36
The main reason for wanting to convert rammed coke ovens into top-charging coke ovens is that these two types of ovens follow different approaches in terms of utilizing coking coal resources; moreover, the quality of the coke produced is different as well. The pore structure of the coke varies, which leads to different reactions in blast furnaces. Additionally, there are no examples in China of blast furnaces with a capacity of over 3,000 cubic meters that use rammed coke. Therefore, considering converting the tamped coke oven into a top-charging type. I wonder if there are any successful cases in China? I hope everyone can give an introduction.
You’re misusing someone else’s money. Even if the claim that \"none of the blast furnaces in China with a capacity of over 3,000 cubic meters use compacted coke\" holds some truth, isn’t it still possible to buy top-loaded coke on the market?
Hehe, I work in coking. I have worked on 7.63-meter top-charging coke ovens, and I have also been involved in converting 66-4 type coke ovens from top-charging to tamping type. The shift from ramming to top-loading is mainly due to market reasons, in order to increase the market share of coke. After all, you can’t make white steamed buns without white flour, right?
The resources of coal used for coking are decreasing; there have been changes from top charging to tamping, but I haven’t heard of any changes from tamping to top charging yet! ! ! ! ! ! Tamped coking is the inevitable path for expanding the use of coal in coking – shall we go back? ! ! ! ! ! :lol :lol :funk: