HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Problems with the austenometer

2009-03-27View Original

Thread Content

When using an austenometer, the solution inside it needs to be replaced frequently. It seems that there are still many active ingredients in it that could be utilized, so replacing it seems like a waste. Is there any way to detect these active ingredients in the solution so that they can be reused? Is it possible to find an appropriate indicator that can indicate the active ingredient in it? This post was last edited by zjs0536 on 2009-3-29 16:25.]
Reply #22009-03-27
By the time the solution in the austenometer is used up, it is basically no longer effective, or its absorption capacity is poor, resulting in a mixture containing many impurities; it is difficult to recycle such solutions. Moreover, these absorption reagents are quite cheap, so it isn’t worth attempting to recycle them. There is no need for an indicator to show the active components present, because before you even manage to use up those components, the absorption efficiency of your austenometer has already declined significantly, requiring a new absorbing solution to be used.
Reply #32009-03-27
The main use of the residue from the austenite meter is in copper smelting, as stated by the recycling manufacturers, and I believe that too. However, I am not in favor of such savings. Quality is not guaranteed! Safety and quality are always of the highest priority!
Reply #42009-03-27
What the two people above said makes a lot of sense; upon careful consideration, it’s not worth it! Hehe! The pursuit of savings comes at a cost; sometimes the price is higher than the benefits! It’s not worth it!
Reply #52009-03-28
When encountering such difficult-to-handle waste, it is recommended that Haiyou collect it and hand it over to the reagent suppliers. In this way, by aggregating the amounts, it becomes easier for the manufacturers to find ways to recycle it. In fact, there are many things for which, if we take action, unexpected benefits can arise.
Reply #62009-03-28
I agree with the view from the third floor: quality comes first. It’s not advisable to sacrifice accuracy in analysis just to save a small amount of money!
Reply #72009-03-28
From an economic perspective, there is no value in recycling it; If it is to reduce environmental pollution, recycling could be considered.
Reply #82009-04-01
We also use an O₂ gas analyzer every day; it’s very easy to replace the absorbent solution. It’s not worth sacrificing a little accuracy just to save some time

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.