HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Discussion on the scale and number of sulfur recovery units in refineries

2009-03-27View Original

Thread Content

Assuming that a refinery can recover a total of 100,000 tons of sulfur per year, what would be the most optimal configuration for its sulfur recovery and exhaust gas treatment systems? The available options are as follows: A – Build one sulfur recovery unit with a capacity of 100,000 tons per year, at one end and one other end; B – Build two sulfur recovery units, each with a capacity of 50,000 tons per year, at one end and one other end; C – Build two sulfur recovery units, each with a capacity of 50,000 tons per year, at both ends; D – Build three sulfur recovery units, with capacities of 40,000–50,000 tons per unit, at two ends or at one end and two other ends; E – Other options (please suggest them)
Reply #22009-03-28
The specific solution to choose depends on the type of oil you are processing. If high-sulfur oil is processed over a long period with little variation in its type, and the feed to the sulfur recovery unit remains stable, then Option A is the best choice. However, if the sulfur content of the crude oil being processed varies significantly and the feed to the sulfur recovery unit is not stable, then option C can be considered. The operating range of a normal sulfur recovery unit is 30-110%; taking into account shutdowns or the possibility of processing low-sulfur oil (when the acid gas load is lower), it is recommended to use one unit with a capacity of 20,000 tons per year and another with a capacity of 80,000 tons per year, with the exhaust gases preferably separated from each other.
Reply #32009-03-28
Option C involves constructing two sulfur recovery units with a capacity of 50,000 tons per year each. As a environmental protection project, such units are not allowed to stop operating; therefore, Option C is chosen – two units of 50,000 tons per year each, one in operation and one as a backup, to facilitate maintenance work
Reply #42009-03-28
If a sudden failure occurs in one of the sulfur-related equipment units and the system can no longer handle acidic gas, what should be done in an emergency? Should the acidic gas be burned in a flare? How should one adjust in such a situation?
Reply #52009-03-28
? ? ? ? In case of an emergency shutdown, the only option is to vent the gas; even with two sets of equipment, it takes time to activate the other one. The equipment malfunctions; it depends on the situation – on how long it takes to repair it, with a short period of inactivity or a longer period of shutdown.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.