How can one recruit good analysts and QA professionals
Thread Content
How to recruit good analysts and QA professionals, and how to conduct interviews
The original poster can refer to: “Qualities That Analysts Must Possess” http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-350218-1-1.html. Based on the content of the two topic posts, namely \"How to Improve Analytical Staff’s Professional Skills and Comprehensive Qualities\" http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-409741-1-1.html, determine the interview questions in light of the conditions of your own company
You should look for those with work experience; those who have just graduated from school lack practical experience, though they may be very quick to learn. The interview can be divided into a theoretical part and a practical operation part – for the theoretical part, some simple basic questions are sufficient, while for the practical part, actual hands-on operations are required
I think three things are quite important: dedication, reliability, and hard work. But it’s still pretty difficult to find such people: lol
New recruits are generally sent to the workshop to get familiar with the production process over a period of about 3 months, so as to gain a practical understanding of process control.
Analysts should have a relevant chemical background, right? Analysts should also be careful, especially patient. Because the same experimental procedures are repeated almost every day, over time experience is gained, but care is no longer put into the work.
An expert asks another expert, and the answer is clear at once. I’m afraid hiring an amateur will result in another amateur!
Actually, I think it’s not too hard to find analysts; you just need to teach them how to analyze things, as these tasks are quite simple and can be handled by ordinary vocational school graduates. Many things are done repeatedly, so over time everyone becomes experienced. But for QA work, it’s better to hire people with relevant certificates; working with certified professionals is the **trend. Again: One should not take on responsibilities beyond their scope. Once he takes responsibility, people will invest more time and effort to ensure that he can live with a clear conscience. Many things depend on human effort; give him a stage, and he will showcase his brilliance!
When recruiting analysts, I think in addition to having the necessary chemical knowledge, being careful and diligent, they also need to have a rigorous scientific attitude – analysis cannot be done carelessly
Are the following general requirements acceptable: a secondary vocational school diploma or higher in chemistry, with no gender restriction. At least 3 years of experience in analytical work in the field of fine chemistry (experience gained during studies can also be counted). Proficient in operating gas chromatography and liquid chromatography, as well as knowledgeable in basic maintenance methods. Can skillfully perform basic chemical titrations. Be able to independently develop analysis methods based on the material system and available data
I have to thank my company. When I first started there, I knew nothing; now, though I’m not among the best, I have achieved something. But if I were to leave, I wouldn’t be able to overcome the first hurdle, so it’s better for me to stay put I really want to hire a qualified professional; it would be best to ignore age, educational qualifications, and English proficiency. With this bias toward practical talents, not a single one can be recruited using this method. Those with diplomas are recruited; once their skills improve a bit, they advance quickly. Unless your position and compensation can always meet his expectations. I tried, it didn’t work. Personal opinion!
Today’s college students are plentiful; there’s no need to recruit those from vocational schools. I’m sorry, but that’s just how reality is. As for good QA personnel, they need to be developed, as the people in this department hold high positions and generally don’t change jobs easily.