Is it necessary to use a dummy membrane for trial operation when replacing the membrane in an ion exchange cell as a whole?
Thread Content
This post was last edited by sunjl1981 on 2013-1-6 at 19:57. The ZMBCH-2.7 electrochemical cell manufactured by our factory has been in use for four years; currently, its current efficiency is low and the frequency of leaks from the cell has increased. We plan to replace these cells in batches. When the other cells are still in operation, and without a device for operating a single cell separately, is it necessary to use a dummy membrane to test the cells that are being replaced? # ， ， &
Installing a false membrane can be used to conduct a leak test on the cell first, to check whether there are any problems with it. In the case of membrane replacement, there is no need to use a fake membrane.
There’s no need to install a fake membrane then; just drive according to the normal procedures. Strengthening monitoring is key. When replacing the membrane, carefully inspect the cell compartments.
There is no need to install a fake membrane; the gasket should be applied and the membrane installed according to the operational instructions, and the vehicle can then be driven following normal procedures. Our company uses Kyocera’s product, and we are currently working on this task.
There is no need for a dummy membrane trial run when replacing the membrane; it is sufficient to check the gaskets properly.
Hello, colleague. The use of a pseudo-film is a common method during the initial startup of the electrolysis process. By pseudo-film, we generally mean plastic sheets (old films can also be used), and this approach has two advantages: first, it allows for the thorough cleaning and calibration of both the electrolyzer and the entire system. II. Perform the initial compression of the electrolyzer and complete the debugging procedures, including conducting airtightness tests and pressure tests on the electrolyzer. There’s no need to use a fake membrane for your slots anymore. This post was last edited by limingshuguang on 2009-3-30 at 19:58.]
There’s no need to conduct a test run with a fake membrane; it’s not the first time driving this vehicle.
There should be no need for a trial run with a fake membrane; if the installation workers have not operated such equipment for a long time, they should be retrained. After removing the electrolyzer, carefully inspect the frame of the electrolyzer – replace any frames that are damaged. Follow the procedures specified for installing the membrane, and generally there should be no problems.
It depends on your own situation: the employees’ skills, the company’s production management level, and your own confidence. I would suggest that the original poster make their own decision. What others say is just for reference. This post was last edited by yzhms on 2009-3-31 13:01]
It’s not the first time driving; there’s no need to install a fake film
Oh, I’m new here. I need to learn a bit