HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Don’t say-----------state-owned enterprises are bad

2009-04-05View Original

Thread Content

Many people who have worked in state-owned enterprises say that the interpersonal relationships there are complex, and those who perform well are not as recognized as those who are good at talking; Those with strength are not as good as those with connections. Those who have just joined state-owned enterprises are pleased to have found a good place to work, but at the same time they are worried about their future. For various reasons, state-owned enterprises end up failing to make the most of their employees’ talents, and their operations are slow and inefficient – and that’s just how it is. We can’t change it, what should we do? Don’t be full of complaints, don’t give in to despair; do what we need to do. Leverage one’s strengths, keep accumulating knowledge and learning continuously, and release it in a well-considered manner. Believe that gold will always shine! ! ! ! ! 1
Reply #22009-04-05
Well said; I think state-owned enterprises are quite good – at least the benefits and holidays are better. They generally follow rules strictly, while private companies are far inferior. In my company, we have to work 26 days a month, don’t get proper rest during holidays, and there’s very little overtime paid. Ah! I wish I could work in a state-owned enterprise.
Reply #32009-04-05
I think it would be great if I were a civil servant.
Reply #42009-04-05
State-owned enterprises and private enterprises each have their own advantages, and cannot be compared. As for the various benefits offered by private enterprises, they are not as good as those in state-owned enterprises, which provide a wider range of benefits. This is due to the existing system: various rules and regulations have been established to protect workers’ rights, but these regulations are not properly implemented. It cannot be blamed on private enterprises for not complying with these rules; rather, it is because some people and certain authorities fail to enforce the laws properly, and there is a tendency to turn a blind eye. Additionally, insufficient social oversight contributes to the situation where private enterprises can take advantage of such loopholes. Currently, the vast majority of foreign companies in China have also learned this trick: “If an orange grows in the south, it remains an orange; if it grows in the north, it becomes a ‘zhi’.” I think that in developed countries, such companies would not act in such an outrageous manner.
Reply #52009-04-05
Foreign companies rely on their strength, while state-owned companies depend on connections! Improving one’s own capabilities is the true key to success!
Reply #62009-04-06
I think state-owned enterprises are suitable for those who don’t have to worry about food and clothing. If you want to make money, then don’t work in a state-owned enterprise, unless you can climb the ranks; that’s another matter if you have connections.
Reply #72009-04-06
Each has its drawbacks: state-owned enterprises currently have chaotic management and low efficiency, while private enterprises are not very organized

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.