Regarding the Registered Safety Engineer Examination
Thread Content
Our company has around 30 employees, and at present there are 4 registered safety engineers. All qualified employees in our company are either taking or preparing to take the exam to become registered safety engineers. Our belief is that safety comes first, and the more registered safety engineers there are, the better. Taking this exam constitutes a comprehensive training session in safety. What do you all think? This post was last edited by hw197358 on 2009-4-5 23:14]
Taking the safety engineer exam is, arguably, more systematic and comprehensive than safety education! Because in regular safety education, the training is basically focused only on matters related to the company itself, which implies a certain degree of limitation and one-sidedness. And once one takes the safety engineer exam, the knowledge acquired is systematic and comprehensive, covering a variety of industries, which makes it easier to apply that knowledge in practice and make comparisons! This post was last edited by lyhh9024 on 2009-4-5 20:14.]
Safety first; those who are qualified should take the safety certification exam to establish a comprehensive safety awareness system.
This phenomenon reflects, on the one hand, everyone’s emphasis on safety-related work; on the other hand, it is due to the fact that after Lord Li’s speech, the requirements for the safety professional qualification exam were greatly relaxed, making it much easier to pass compared to other professional qualification exams. As a result, the value of this qualification has been significantly reduced. Many people are taking advantage of this situation, and this may not necessarily be a good thing for those in the field of safety professionals
In fact, the safety engineer exam currently only covers the level of a safety technician – in some cases, it’s even below that of a technician. Passing the exam merely grants one the title of engineer; it doesn’t carry much significance otherwise