Thread Content
I am currently collecting and organizing all the analysis materials from this forum; the initial collection phase has been completed, and now sorting is to be carried out. A trial sorting session in the afternoon gave me a shock of cold sweat; when trying to save the data, many items failed to be saved, so I had to start over and save it again. This makes me think that if all the forum materials are categorized in large quantities, I won’t be able to find those that haven’t been saved. My question is: For someone like me, with just a name and an index, how many entries can be stored in one post? I will replan the categorization and floor arrangement based on the capacity. Otherwise, if it doesn’t go low enough, that’s also a problem. I hope those who are aware of this can kindly offer some guidance! Otherwise, one can only cross the river by feeling the stones underfoot, and there will definitely be some losses. After spending nearly two thousand points, the task of collecting information has finally been completed. I would like to express my gratitude to the several moderators and senior moderators who actively cooperated with me and gave positive ratings! Without your generous assistance, things would not have been completed so quickly. If this index post can help the analysts in the chemical analysis section, you deserve the greatest credit for that; I extend my sincere thanks to you! ! ! I will continue to finish the remaining classification work to help forum members find information more quickly. There are a few more minor issues: 1. The issue of duplicate materials in the chemical analysis version: should they be removed or kept alongside each other? 2. Issue of duplicated content across editions: How to handle it? Some are first published in chemical analysis outlets, and then posted in various industry sections as well. There is a sequence of time – should it be deleted or presented side by side? Some materials are repetitive, but they do make it easier for fellow readers to find what they need. How should this be handled? Some materials are repetitive, but the way they are compressed into volumes varies; there are more volumes in the earlier periods and fewer in the later ones, each with its own characteristics. How should one decide which to keep and which to discard? My personal opinion is to keep it if possible. During the organization process, a topic post was accidentally deleted: when preparing the reply post for the booklet, the topic post also disappeared. I apologize to the original poster for this. Also, for some posts, the content is not visible because the original poster was placed under surveillance; it seems those posts were either advertisements or spam. I deleted those topic posts – there were about ten of them in total. I’m not sure if I violated any rules or acted improperly Please provide guidance on proper operation! Regarding the development direction of the chemical analysis version, we also hope that knowledgeable individuals will share their valuable insights! This post was last edited by chengjingbao on 2009-4-5 23:46]
1. Respect for the original poster’s hard work! “An index – how many entries can be contained within one post? Perhaps the cleaner can answer that. However, for the wealth spent on exploration, it is possible to apply for a subsidy from the administrator or the publisher. 2. Repeat post materials; keep only the earlier or more complete one and delete the others to save space on the forum. 3. For repeated posting across editions, the same handling applies, to be carried out by the edition supervisor. 4. For materials that are divided into many volumes, my approach is usually to download them first, reorganize them into appropriate volumes, edit them, and then upload them. The size of each volume should be suitable so as to facilitate downloading for everyone and also save the downloaders money. 5. Mistakes can sometimes be unavoidable; simply explain the situation to the person who posted the message, or you can also contact the cleaner to restore things to their original state. Deleting posts that violate the rules is no problem; it is also within the responsibilities of moderators. Thank you for your efforts!
Thanks for the reply from above. I have no idea what a super moderator is; please forgive me. 1. As for the issue of wealth, I don’t think it should be a problem; one can either spend or earn money, and I believe I’m capable of doing that ; Compensation is waived; it’s not very useful for my purposes for now. 2. I will implement Article 2 as appropriate. 3. There’s an issue with the index entries: in the automated version it seems to be able to handle over 100 entries, but I already lost entries after just 50 of them yesterday afternoon. I don’t know if it was an accident or something else I arranged it according to 100 items
yunzhongwu6753 is your super moderator. Bincheng is the old version of the industrial zone, haha.