EM high-efficiency organic fertilizer? Is that true?
Thread Content
I heard there is something called EM high-efficiency organic fertilizer; I’m not sure if it’s real or not. It is said that this fertilizer is the result of technical cooperation between China and South Korea; it is produced and sold exclusively in China by a certain company, which has been granted an invention patent with the number ZL2005100360366. It represents the world’s first of its kind – a cutting-edge, purely natural fertilizer free from residues and pollutants, and it constitutes a revolution in the fertilizer industry. It contains not only the five essential elements of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium, but also 22 trace elements. The main elements are: CN nitrogen (negative), CaO calcium, P2O5 phosphorus (negative), MgO magnesium, SiO2 silicon, Al2O3 aluminum, Fe2O3 iron, K2O potassium, Na2O sodium, MnO2 manganese, and F fluorine. This fertilizer is non-volatile and insoluble in water; it can be dissolved and absorbed by crops only after new roots produce citric acid, which enables the dissolution of this citrate-soluble fertilizer. It is said that one dose of fertilizer can last for three years. It sounds pretty amazing, but I’m not sure if it’s true or not; does such a fertilizer really exist? I’m really worried it’s a scam. I hope the experts can help determine what’s genuine and what’s not. Thank you so much!
Judging from the description, it seems to be pure nonsense; the estimated value refers to waste materials from the main product, and the concentration isn’t very high. It also appears that the patent number is fake as well
Patent Number: 200510036036.6 Name: Long-acting Soluble Phosphorus Fertilizer Applicant: Lin Jifang Abstract: This invention discloses a long-acting soluble phosphorus fertilizer, which is made from natural apatite as the main raw material through physical crushing and mixing. The weight percentage of its components is as follows: combined phosphorus accounts for 56–70%, chlorite accounts for 30–40%, and blood meal accounts for 0–4%. This invention boasts the advantages of long-lasting fertilizer efficacy, safety, and no environmental pollution, and can be widely applied in the cultivation of crops and cash crops. It is actually produced by physically crushing apatite. What does it have to do with EM bacteria? -.-b Last edited by ragna78 on 2009-4-7 08:52 ]
EM should refer to beneficial microorganisms – it’s short for ‘beneficial microbes’. From the poster’s description, it seems that these beneficial microbes should be a key focus of promotion, yet not a single word is mentioned on their subject; instead, a lot of unnecessary information is provided. It appears to be nothing but deception
EM technology should have originated in little Japan; what you’re saying is purely a lie
Thunder rumbled loudly. :'(:'(:'(:'(:'(:'(