HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

I would like to ask about the issue of the beam melting

2009-04-06View Original

Thread Content

In the later stages of polycrystalline silicon rod production using the bell jar method (such as at 140 hours and 1700+A), a temperature difference begins to appear between the upper and lower parts of the rod. This temperature difference gradually increases; the lower part melts while the upper part turns black. Over time, the rod is no longer viable for use. Why does this happen? Which parameters are related to this phenomenon? Is it the amount of gas? Temperature? The speed of increasing current? I hope for more details. I’m hoping that those who work in the field of restoration can help solve this issue
Reply #22009-04-12
As the silicon rod grows, the temperature of the crossbeam tends to rise; in such cases, it is necessary to reduce the current to keep the temperature from getting too high
Reply #32009-04-12
It’s growing too fast, and the frequency of current increase is too high. What are your power consumption and primary reduction rate?
Reply #42009-04-13
I don’t know about statistical issues like power consumption and conversion efficiency
Reply #52009-04-13
The crossbeam develops a corn-like shape; the lower part is usually in better condition while the upper part shows this effect more noticeably. As a result, no current flows through the upper part, whereas excessive current flows through the lower part, leading to melting
Reply #62009-04-14
The crossbeam develops a corn-like shape; the lower part is usually in better condition while the upper part shows this effect more noticeably. As a result, no current flows through the upper part, whereas excessive current flows through the lower part, leading to melting. What this marine enthusiast said is incorrect – the current is the same throughout, it’s only the thickness that differs, which in turn results in different resistances and varying levels of heat generation, thereby causing melting. I asked about the reduction rate once because I think the amount of material passing through is too large, which results in a low reduction rate; moreover, excessive pressure can also cause this problem
Reply #72009-04-14
So, to know how long the silicon rod has grown, if you’re not sure, it’s better to take a look through the viewing hole. Don’t wait until the crossbeam melts before taking action – the temperature is high at the corners of the crossbeam, which results in higher current flow, and higher current flow in turn leads to even higher temperatures
Reply #82009-04-15
What does it mean that the material flow rate is too high? There’s too much trichlorosilane and too little hydrogen – is the ratio incorrect? ? ! ! !
Reply #92009-04-15
It has nothing to do with the ratio; it’s still a current issue

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.