HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What are the negative mentalities of those who violate regulations?

2009-04-06View Original

Thread Content

There are many reasons for accidents, but analysis shows that 80%-90% of them are caused by violations of procedures and mistakes made by operators. Analysis of investigations into violators and accident cases shows that there are six psychological states during violations: First, the mentality of taking things for granted and relying on luck – treating one’s work as routine experience, feeling no danger, and paying no attention to rules and regulations. When such thoughts occur, the violator is conscious, but they fail to take account of the complexity of the objective conditions, resulting in an accident. II. Emotional interference in psychology: Just as people feel energetic when faced with happy events, happiness, satisfaction, and joy enhance one’s ability to observe keenly, react quickly, move swiftly, and perform tasks accurately (although extreme joy can also lead to sorrow). On the contrary, when operators work in a bad mood, they may lose focus or forget to follow the procedures, which leads to accidents. III. A competitive and reckless attitude – Such people lack experience and have limited abilities, yet they are overly confident; they like to show off and take reckless risks. For example, in order to save time and ensure completion of a project, or when faced with critical problems that affect production and need to be resolved urgently, people with an impulsive nature or full of youthful vigor are prone to take risky actions without considering the consequences. IV. Psychological state of tension and faulty judgment: Operators, due to certain reasons, are under psychological stress; they fail to respond properly to external situations and end up acting hastily, resulting in accidents. V. Rebellious and confrontational attitude: Feeling annoyed by the guidance and reminders from supervisors and colleagues, ignoring rules and regulations, and bringing emotions into work. VI. Lack of technical proficiency and blind optimism: Making hasty and incorrect judgments due to a lack of safety knowledge, insufficient technical skills, and inadequate experience. In particular, only the positive aspects of the working conditions are taken into account, while the complex, variable, and potentially dangerous nature of the objective conditions is ignored. Being careless in thinking and overly optimistic leads to panic and helplessness when an accident occurs. After an accident, violators generally have three types of attitudes: the first is one of regret ; The second is a sense of resentment; the third is **psychological state. The poor psychological state of violators is a major threat to safety in research and production; it is an important issue that we must address seriously in our safety management efforts. In response to the psychological states of these 6 types of violators, the appropriate measures should be as follows: first, carry out extensive and in-depth education on the principle of putting safety first, vigorously promote the Party’s guidelines and policies regarding work safety, raise awareness, and strengthen a sense of responsibility as owners of the situation. Strictly enforce operating procedures, adhere to pre-job training, and enhance employees’ awareness of preventing illegal operations. Second, make safety management scientific by implementing target management and networked management, with target management being broken down at various levels. Third, regular safety inspections should be carried out, and any identified hazards should be rectified promptly. Fourth, persist in safety education and training, and institutionalize it.
Reply #22009-04-06
As an expert in security, could the original poster analyze the prevention of threats posed by these six types of individuals with psychological issues separately? How should such employees be trained?
Reply #32009-04-06
The original poster has analyzed it very thoroughly. To eliminate violations, it is essential to foster good working habits among employees, create a favorable working environment for them so that they can avoid bringing their emotions into the workplace, and also change their mindsets through educational efforts, while strengthening training in safety knowledge and skills.
Reply #42009-04-06
The summary is quite comprehensive; most people rely on luck, thinking that they won’t encounter any problems by operating in violation of rules. It’s better to be prepared for the worst; that’s how safety works.
Reply #52009-04-06
Actors with the first type of mindset overestimate their own capacity to act. The stronger an individual’s capabilities, the better their skills, and the more experience they have, the greater their confidence in the success of their actions, and the stronger their motivation to act. As the saying goes, \"Great skills bring great courage,\" and such people often ignore rules and regulations. In the recent reports on a series of accidents caused by human error, many were resulting from violations of rules and regulations by key personnel such as team leaders and technicians. For such actors: first, strengthen the publicity and education on safety management systems ; Secondly, it is necessary to strengthen supervision at the work sites; those who follow the procedures must be rewarded, while those who do not comply with them should be treated as if an accident has occurred. Those who repeatedly violate the rules must be severely punished, even to the point of being dismissed ; Third, make full use of the influence of family bonds.
Reply #62009-04-06
Thank you very much for your suggestion. Let’s work together to analyze the psychology of those who violate regulations and explore targeted preventive measures.
Reply #72009-04-06
*Inherent violations are the biggest obstacle to safe production in current chemical enterprises, while low competence and lack of responsibility are the two main causes of such inherent violations
Reply #82009-04-06
The main purpose of safety education and training is to improve employees’ competence and sense of responsibility.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.