HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Selection of gas masks

2009-04-08View Original

Thread Content

As there is a large amount of hydrogen chloride gas in the working environment of a new workshop established by our company, it is necessary to wear gas masks while working there. However, considering that the water vapor exhaled during breathing can accumulate on the lens of the mask, causing blurred vision and compromising visibility, we are looking for a gas mask that covers only the mouth and nose. We hope colleagues can provide some guidance! This post was last edited by hw197358 on 2009-4-8 10:27.]
Reply #22009-04-08
Hydrogen chloride gas should be handled using a full-face mask, right? Just the mouth and nose seem inappropriate, right? Does hydrogen chloride cause no harm to the eyes? The above are my personal opinions for reference only; please point out any errors if there are any!
Reply #32009-04-08
We use the Bagu COSMO series full-face masks, and the results are excellent
Reply #42009-04-08
Wetting the lenses with egg white before wearing a gas mask will prevent any impact on vision; this method is originally used for swimming goggles
Reply #52009-04-08
It is not sufficient to protect only the mouth and nose while ignoring the eyes, as HCL is also irritating to the eyes.
Reply #62009-04-08
I also think that it’s necessary to protect not only the mouth, nose, and eyes, but also the face and body. I recommend that supervisors choose models with electric air circulation; this way, even in hot summer weather when sweating, one won’t feel stuffy nor will their vision become blurred, especially when wearing fire and chemical protection suits. But the manager said that protective goggles could be used to shield the eyes, yet using electric ventilation would affect work efficiency and might also pose other safety risks, so the idea was rejected. . . . . . The suggestion for the 4th floor is good; I’ll give it a try and see how it works.
Reply #72009-04-08
It is not allowed for the working environment to exceed safety standards, and even the use of good protective equipment will not do. It’s better to focus on the equipment and processes.
Reply #82009-04-08
In terms of equipment manufacturing processes, our company’s safety management department has no control over them. Given this situation, how should the safety management department handle it?
Reply #92009-04-08
Based on what the poster has described, I think the issue of hydrogen chloride gas leaks or emissions should first be addressed from a technical perspective (since the poster did not clarify this), so as to prevent workers from having to work in a toxic and harmful working environment for long periods of time! A gas mask is only a temporary protective device; no matter how good it is, it cannot withstand long-term use! Moreover, for hydrogen chloride gas, a half-mask respirator should not be used!
Reply #102009-04-12
Is hydrogen chloride irritating to the eyes, or is a comprehensive assessment needed?
Reply #112009-04-12
I think a half-mask with eye protection would work too
Reply #122009-04-12
A half-mask combined with protective glasses can prevent the exhaled moisture from reaching the eyes, but when it’s hot, the moisture in the eyes evaporates just like sweat, causing blurred vision. I’ve never used the egg white method, but over time, won’t the protein denature?
Reply #132009-04-28
When the hydrogen chloride concentration is low, it can also be used through the mouth and nose.
Reply #142009-05-01
We also use Bagu gas masks, or positive-pressure air respirators, and they work well
Reply #152009-05-02
To address the issue without dealing with its root causes, it is necessary to tackle the problem of hydrogen chloride leaks at their source. In chemical manufacturing facilities, it is especially important to take precautions; in the event of an accident, shutting down operations for repairs can be very troublesome. It is better to make an upfront investment to reduce pollution and benefit future generations
Reply #162009-05-03
Technically, it was just built recently, and the company isn’t willing to spend more money on it, as it’s merely a place for handling waste; there’s nothing else that can be done. So it’s impossible to make improvements from a technical standpoint; only passive protection is possible. The company also fails to understand that one option involves long-term problems while the other involves short-term ones! After careful consideration, the company’s senior management chose passive protection.
Reply #172009-05-03
The eyes still need protection; you can wear an eye mask separately
Reply #182009-05-03
Working in a hydrogen chloride environment for a long time – even the best masks wouldn’t be sufficient; improving the environment is the most important thing
Reply #192009-05-03
Ordinary masks are useless; the masks used in our laboratory for coal grinding look like pig heads, and after the grinding process, one’s nose is filled with coal dust. So it’s best not to work in such an environment, as it has a severe impact on health

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.