Rating criteria for regular members – Version 20090601
Thread Content
Based on some feedback, the scoring values have been adjusted. The purpose of these adjustments is to make the overall scoring system of the forum more appropriate. The forum is a space for collective participation; it is hoped that people will engage in discussions in a calm manner and focus their attention on technical topics. There is no need to expect anything in return when helping others, but one should learn to be grateful when receiving help from others. Scoring criteria – Version from 2009-06-01: The total score for certain rating levels has been increased, with a maximum score per rating set at 20 points, meaning scores should be given in small amounts multiple times. It is also hoped that everyone will familiarize themselves with the scoring criteria and avoid giving arbitrary scores, as the scores you assign reflect your own opinions. Please read the *scoring criteria* before rating: http://bbs.hcbbs.com/thread-29061-1-1.html. Grade | Wealth that can be rated (per 24 hours) | New students who haven’t reported themselves | 0 | First grade at Haichuan Primary School | 2 (maximum +1 per rating) | Second grade at Haichuan Primary School | 6 (maximum +2 per rating) | Third grade at Haichuan Primary School | 30 (maximum +3 per rating) | Fourth grade at Haichuan Primary School | 40 (maximum +4 per rating) | Fifth grade at Haichuan Primary School | 60 (maximum +5 per rating) | Sixth grade at Haichuan Primary School | 100 (maximum +7 per rating) | First grade at Haichuan Junior High School | 180 (maximum +9 per rating) | Second grade at Haichuan Junior High School | 260 (maximum +10 per rating) | Third grade at Haichuan Junior High School | 350 (maximum +11 per rating) | First grade at Haichuan Senior High School | 400 (maximum +12 per rating) | Second grade at Haichuan Senior High School | 450 | Third grade at Haichuan Senior High School | 500 | First year at Haichuan University | 600 (maximum +15 per rating) | Second year at Haichuan University | 700 | Third year at Haichuan University | 800 | Fourth year at Haichuan University | 900 | Master’s student at Haichuan Research Institute | 1000 (maximum +20 per rating) | Doctoral student at Haichuan Research Institute | 1500 | Professor at Haichuan University | 2000 | Academician at Haichuan University | 3000. ——————————————— For member 22090420: VIP1 member – 15 (maximum +5 per rating); VIP2 member – 30; Lifetime VIP member – 45 (actively upgrade to obtain higher scoring privileges). Your rating is an acknowledgment of the effort put in by the poster. PS: If the rating exceeds 15 characters, the excess will be displayed in abbreviated form; click to view the full rating
After learning it, is it necessary to promote it to regular members?
In this way, once I have rated many times, I will be able to rate many people. Thank you, site administrator!
It seems the administrator has been giving long-term thought to how to improve the website, haha – support for the development of the forum!
Now, regular members rarely give ratings to others. . Most of them are rated by the moderators. Hehe! ! ~Support the boss – in small amounts, but frequently! ~
With fewer ratings among members, could this reduce the enthusiasm of regular members? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Please ask my sister to give me more ratings; I’m in college and the expenses are high! :handshake
All three grades in junior high are 100, senior high is 300, and university is 500. It is recommended to further break down the assessable wealth value in order to motivate members to upgrade; otherwise, it may also cause psychological imbalance among senior members.
I’m in elementary school; it’s no different for me
I agree with what was said on floor 8. It is relatively difficult for regular members to upgrade; there are only three levels: junior high, high school, and university, and there is no difference between levels within the same category. This can easily lead to discouragement and frustration, ultimately causing a loss of motivation to upgrade.
That’s about it, that’s how it’s done
Good idea; this encourages members to reach the higher grades as soon as possible.
In the process of learning*, the management system can be continuously improved in this way. Supported.
This is already good enough; on some forums, only moderators can give ratings, while regular members cannot. I hope fellow sailors will cherish the powers, or rather benefits, granted to them by their station masters. Use valuable resources effectively, make good use of the power at one’s disposal, understand the scoring criteria, and boost members’ enthusiasm for participating in forum development and technical exchanges; this will in turn increase the forum’s popularity and help to improve it further.
I agree with what was said on the 8th floor; in any case, I support the development of this forum
I agree with the station master’s opinion! Forums are always becoming more rational through continuous improvement and change!
Support. It’s a chemical engineering forum after all; it’s not meant to be an upgrade-focused forum. What matters is learning, discussing, and exchanging ideas, not upgrades. Of course, I still hope that members with higher technical skills and those who are actively involved in technical exchanges will be at a higher level.
The total score is higher, but the maximum score has decreased! Good stickers can only be given in small amounts!
By learning*, one can give points to fellow users who share the same views; it’s a way to reward others while also enjoying the pleasure of making friends!
This can boost the enthusiasm of regular members, allowing them to learn*
It’s quite good; it reflects the different rights allocated to various contributors at different times. It won’t result in a loss of the forum’s wealth