Dear sea friends: Who have you given your ratings to? . . . . . ? ? ? ? ? ?
Thread Content
Who did you give your ratings to? 1. You gave most of your scores to post 2, which you considered excellent. You gave a 3 to most of your ratings for the technical exchange posts. You gave most of your ratings a 4 to the posts of your friends (both in real life and online). You gave most of your scores a 5 to the post that replied to yours. You gave most of your scores a 6 to the moderator’s posts. You gave most of your scores a 7 to posts by senior members or new members. Rate the posts of those who rated yours; are all your ratings in that section? 1. Most of your scores are in Technical Exchange Area 2. Most of your ratings are in the member areas (leisure area, workplace communication area, forum discussion area). What is your criteria for assigning ratings? 1. Subjective judgment on how many points a post should be rated (higher or lower). 2. The maximum value of permissions that can always be rated (the same amount) is 3. Technical exchange posts receive high scores, while other discussion posts get low scores of 000. You almost never rate other people’s posts with 000. There is no pattern; it can occur with any member in any forum, and the score is random. This post was last edited by Hongru on 2009-4-10 21:28]
Who did you give your ratings to? There’s no way to choose; those with high ranks as far as site administrators, down to newly registered members, have all been rated. Both familiar and unfamiliar ones have been rated. It’s more of a random comment. Are all your ratings in that section? Most of the ratings are in the member area (leisure area, forum discussion area); there are also ratings in the technical area, and evaluations have been given in the beginner area as well. It’s kind of random commentary. What are your scoring criteria? The leisure area generally requires 5 wealth, the business area usually does not exceed 10 wealth, and the technology exchange area requires at least 5 wealth, though there are exceptions. I don’t dare to comment on this casually. :lol Last edited by sister on 2009-4-11 01:19 ]
You cannot rate areas other than your own section. . :Also, the vast majority of the scores remained at home and were not used up
My rating: 1. Comes across as interesting, constructive, independent – prefers to make a mistake rather than overlook something important: lol. 2. Acts in a reciprocal manner, considering the convenience of others as well as oneself, and never fails to keep its promises (in terms of personal behavior). These are my honest opinions; the scores may vary, but what matters is whether the answer is worthwhile
I’m ashamed to say that I rarely rate others, unless I have the time and inclination to do so.
1. First, it should be understandable; second, it should be considered a good post. 2. Any post related to bolts. 3. Distributed across all forums.
1. Give yourself good posts you’re interested in. :) 2. Post comments for marine friends with unique insights. ;P 3. Rate based on your own unique taste. :Lol 4. For us poor lower-year students who dare to speak up. :L
It’s mainly given to lower-level users like me; of course, the rating depends on one’s own interests. Of course, I won’t hesitate to give good posts high ratings – my goal is to use up all my rating points! ~
I rate posts as soon as I see them. However, sometimes I feel sympathy when I see posts asking for points; generally, I give lower-grade students more opportunities to get points, as I feel they really need them, just like when I first arrived. I take scoring my replies to my own topic posts very seriously; if I finish scoring them on the same day, I make sure to go back and score them again the next day.
1. For one’s own topic post, they certainly won’t hesitate to rate those who reply, as it is a way to express gratitude and acknowledge the effort put in by others. :Lol. 2. Off-topic posts: For posts that are in-depth and offer unique insights, from which I can gain useful information, I won’t hesitate to give them a high rating. :handshake
I use my ratings mainly in a few areas: 1. Returning the favor (or showing gratitude)； 2. Assign scores to those who responded to my topic post when the relevant moderators have not yet done so. 3. Rate posts that you think are great. 4. Rate the posts made by young new members, encouraging them to post more and reply more often, so as to keep Haichuan popular at all times. The amount of comments, whether many or few, depends on the circumstances at the time and on compliance with the forum’s rules.
It’s mainly posts that I personally consider good and valuable; of course, new users are given appropriate consideration as well.
I can basically not remember who gave me ratings, so I just rate the posts that I think are good whenever I see them. It seems like this isn’t quite in line with the principle of reciprocity, haha. Some of the ratings are thoughtful or applied to good topic posts, but there are also some that are wasted – left unused, and sometimes not enough
I’m a moderator; my ratings can only be given within the sections I’m in, to those posts that I consider good. As for new members, their scores range from 5 to 20
Personal understanding: 1. For new members who have just joined our team, high scores should be given to them. 2. Posts with high quality and technical expertise receive higher scores. 3. Provide certain participation awards to members who are actively involved. 4. For events held at the venues, appropriately increase the scoring criteria.
I gave all my ratings a 1. All were rated 2 for posts considered excellent. All were rated 3 for the technical exchange post. You gave most of your points to post 4, which replied to your post. You gave most of your ratings to posts by senior members or new members; my ratings are all: 1. The scores are all 2 in the technical exchange section. All ratings are in the Member Launch Area (Workplace Communication Area). My rating criteria are: 1. Subjective judgment on what score the post should get