Asbestos identification: Asbestos identification
Thread Content
Two sentences regarding asbestos labeling (not translated by me): Asbestos identification is commonly done with signs and labels. The identification of asbestos can usually be accomplished through symbols and labels. However, the lack of signs or labels does not necessarily mean that asbestos is not present; other methods are sometimes used to identify the location of asbestos-containing materials. Nevertheless, the absence of symbols and labels in a particular area does not imply that there is no asbestos there. Perhaps sometimes it is to identify the locations of some materials containing asbestos. This post was last edited by ludinggi on 2009-4-14 20:31]
Asbestos identification is commonly done with signs and labels. The identification of asbestos is usually accomplished through symbols and labels. However, the lack of signs or labels does not necessarily mean that asbestos is not present; other methods are sometimes used to identify the location of asbestos-containing materials. Nevertheless, the absence of symbols and labels does not necessarily indicate that there is no asbestos there. Sometimes other methods are used to identify the location of asbestos-containing materials. (The place) is not present in the original text; whether it is appropriate to add this is debatable, as it might not be a place after all, but rather something like: item: handshake
Adding something extra may not necessarily improve things; it could even cause problems: lol 1. Asbestos can generally be identified through symbols and labels. 2. However, the lack of signs or labels does not necessarily mean that asbestos is not present; other methods are sometimes used to identify the location of asbestos-containing materials. Nevertheless, the absence of symbols and labels does not necessarily indicate that asbestos is not there, and other approaches are used at times to determine where asbestos-containing materials are located. single does not necessarily mean lonely
These two sentences have already been well translated by the person above; if I were to translate them again, I would change the order to make it more suitable for Chinese expression: 1. Asbestos identification is commonly done with signs and labels. Asbestos is usually identified using signs and labels. 2、.......and other methods are sometimes used to identify the location of asbestos containing materials. Other approaches are sometimes employed as well to determine which locations contain asbestos materials. (location corresponds to the lack of signs or labels; it can only refer to a location.) ）
The word \"location\" in the second half of the sentence can be translated as \"place\", but I think it’s not appropriate to add this word in the first half of the sentence in the original translation. For the word \"identify\", I prefer the meaning of \"label\" rather than \"determine\", as \"determine\" is similar to \"identify\"; after all, this sentence is talking about how to carry out labeling: handshake
Actually, I don’t understand what is meant by “containing material” – what does this “material” refer to?
Is “asbestos containing materials” the same as “asbestos-containing materials”? Is there a missing character here? Example sentence: an RE-containing alloy
However, the lack of signs or labels does not necessarily mean that asbestos does not exist, and other means are sometimes used to identify the location of asbestos-containing materials. The two sentences are related by a causal relationship. Also, regarding the meaning of \"identify\", I think Moku’s understanding is correct. However, the absence of signs and labels does not necessarily mean that there is no asbestos, (because) other methods are sometimes used to identify areas containing asbestos-containing materials.