How should owners deal with unqualified supervision?

You can ask the supervision company to replace people. Our thermal power project has already replaced more than 20 supervisors at the request of the owner. The supervision unit is also hired by the owner to serve the owner, and of course must obey the owner's management. These can be agreed upon in a prior contract.

In this case, the supervisor is awesome. The owner should have clarified the rights and responsibilities in the contract with the supervisor beforehand. If he is disobedient, he will not pay the supervision fee or impose a penalty, or ask the director of the supervisor to change the supervisor. Anyway, it is not easy for the owner to deal with the supervision. The supervisor should be obedient and handle it how he wants. Unless the owner knows nothing about this and asks for the supervision... Then be polite. My buddy, this is the situation with the owner.* * unit * * The department didn't understand anything about the above requirements to complete the task on time. They just focused on the supervisor all day long and begged grandpa and grandma. Anyway, the only purpose is to complete the project no matter what.

Just change it. The premise is that you are sure it is not a misunderstanding. It is best to have evidence in hand.

If you are sure that you are right and he is wrong, be strong and punish them. But if what you do is wrong, then you are cheating. Because you don’t know what to do, I guess it’s because your ability or technical knowledge can’t impress them, or your communication skills are lacking, so they ignore you, so you have to show them how powerful you are, for example, deduct some money.

Brother, there are two types of supervisors who are disobedient. If you want the supervisor to do something illegal, of course he is not willing to take the risk with his little money. If the supervision level is not good, just replace him. What is there to say? Paying lip service is a trivial matter.

Penalize the company where the supervisor works and deduct supervision fees, which is what our company does.

This is simple, just switch to another one. This phenomenon is very common and there is no need to be embarrassed or embarrassed.

Let me share my personal views on this issue: 1. For irresponsible supervisors, the best way to deal with them is to directly make a request for replacement to his superior, the chief supervisory engineer. Of course, the reasons must be sufficient. ； The basis for this approach is naturally the project supervision service contract signed between the owner and the supervision unit. 2. For supervisors who disobey management, it is recommended to analyze specific problems in detail ； Generally speaking, there is only an entrustment contract relationship between the owner (or project management company) and the supervision unit, which is an entrustment based on mutual trust. There should be no management issues, because the management of either party is its internal issue. 3. There should be more communication, negotiation and coordination between owners and supervision agencies. ； The purpose of the owner to hire a supervisor during the construction phase of the project is to ensure the comprehensive and complete performance of the project construction contract, to promote the project to be completed on time according to quality and quantity, and to obtain economic benefits as soon as possible. ； Frequent changes of on-site supervision personnel, fines and deductions of supervision fees, etc. may not necessarily bring good results to the project construction. For reference!

Although the responsibility of supervision is "four controls, two management and one coordination", the actual implementation requires detailed analysis of specific situations. In terms of quality, the owner should give full support to the supervisor. After all, quality is a lifelong responsibility system, and the supervisor bears the brunt. In this regard, as long as it is a normal supervision unit, it is impossible to relax. If the quality control is not strict, the supervision score will definitely be below 60. There is nothing to say, just replace it immediately. As for the progress, costs, etc., it all depends on the owner’s authorization. After all, the supervisor does not have the construction power and machinery, so he must be fully authorized and fully responsible in accordance with the principle of equal responsibilities, rights and interests. Partial authorization and partial obligations will result in no obligation. The more troublesome thing is security. Regulations stipulate that the supervisor must report in addition to the plan and mandatory provisions. However, in fact, as soon as something goes wrong with the project, the supervisor immediately becomes the defendant. * , obviously suspected of unequal rights and responsibilities.

The owner should, in accordance with the "Entrusted Supervision Contract" signed with the supervision company and the supervision regulations, order the supervision company to order incompetent supervision engineers to leave the site within a limited time, and send qualified supervision engineers to the site to carry out supervision work.

I don’t know what aspects the unqualified brother mentioned mainly refers to? 1. If you ask the supervisor to take risks for the sake of progress, he will definitely not reach a consensus with you. 2. At the same time, if you ask the supervisor to supervise the project beyond the standard requirements for better project quality (unless the contract requires it), it will not work. 3. If the supervision level is really not good, then ask the supervision company to replace people, but try to reduce the number of substitutions. In any case, the owner should try his best to coordinate with the supervisor and let the supervisor play his role fully. Otherwise, if this change is made, the owner will still suffer.

I don’t know what aspects the unqualified brother mentioned mainly refers to? 1. If you ask the supervisor to take risks for the sake of progress, he will definitely not reach a consensus with you. 2. At the same time, if you ask the supervisor to supervise the project beyond the standard requirements for better project quality (unless the contract requires it), it will not work. 3. If the supervision level is really not good, then ask the supervision company to replace people, but try to reduce the number of substitutions. In any case, the owner should try his best to coordinate with the supervisor and let the supervisor play his role fully. Otherwise, if this change is made, the owner will still suffer.

You can just ask for a replacement directly. You are afraid that you and the leader may not have the same opinion. It is not enough to just think that the supervisor is incompetent.

We must prevent the supervisor and the construction party from colluding to fool the owner.

It is still necessary to find a formal supervision unit. Many private supervision units win bids at low prices, but then send personnel with low service levels, which leads to dissatisfaction among owners, who are even more reluctant to pay. Professionalism has disrupted the supervision market, creating a vicious cycle. If you think supervision is important and you need supervision to do something, then choose a reputable unit when bidding. Don't want low prices and high-quality services. Generally speaking, these two are contradictory. There are also some good supervision units that always insist on service first.