Thread Content
Interesting “unwritten rules” in companies (you’d never guess if I didn’t tell you~) During my lunch break, I read a book that was just delivered by Dangdang, and I found it quite interesting; I had to share it and talk about it, hehe. This is indeed the problem our company is facing at the moment. Personnel: Having just one senior coach is not enough; it’s better to add an assistant coach. It’s better to have a mediocre person than a talented one – an incompetent leader is the best choice. Meetings: It doesn’t matter what kind of meeting it is; what matters is where people sit during the meeting. Major issues can be resolved more easily through discussion, while minor issues tend to lead to deadlocks. Efficiency: Work involves going back and forth with documents, while problem-solving involves constant pushing and pulling; subordinates end up listening over and over again and waiting endlessly. Talent: The selection of talent in transactions relies on interviews and written tests, while in matters related to personal relationships, physical attractiveness plays a role in the final decision. Building: After passing through several doors and meeting a few people, the thicker the carpet and the more telephones there are, the more important the person you’re going to meet is. Party: Those who chat with acquaintances are powerless and insignificant; those who hide in the corners are timid and fearful; those who wander around the middle of the venue are not accepted by society. Management: Performance standards should be set low so that supervisors can feel pleased with themselves, while managers treat people with indifference. Success: Devoting oneself wholeheartedly to society, working tirelessly day after day, only to become rich and seek ways to avoid taxes. There is absolutely no connection between the number of employees and the actual workload. People with low work efficiency don’t necessarily seem idle, and those with a light workload don’t necessarily appear lazy or careless. The time required to discuss each item on the agenda is inversely proportional to the amount involved in that item. In any talent selection process, if there are more than 50 or fewer than 20 applicants, then everyone will inevitably be eliminated. The more perfectly designed and luxuriously decorated the office building of an organization is, the closer that organization is to disintegration. Poorly managed companies are unable to reform themselves ; Once a company has an \"irredeemable\" leader, immediate action must be taken to curb their destructive effects ; When management issues progress to the second stage, thorough reforms are necessary ; When the company reaches the third stage of management problems that bring it to the brink of collapse, no one can save it. As long as senior leaders are forced to constantly travel between various cities to attend meetings and fill out numerous forms, it won’t be long before they are compelled to request resignation. I’m at work now and don’t have time to write reviews; I hope everyone will offer their criticism.
:L, you’ve actually said it all. Indeed, most companies these days are like that.......
This phenomenon does exist; I’ve been working for over a decade now, and I’ve seen this kind of thing countless times!
It seems that every industry has its own \"unwritten rules\"