Posts by moderators and technical experts in the Process Engineering Technology Exchange Area (20090417)

Let me introduce myself first: Member name: hw197358; Nickname: Dafeng; Position: Area leader; Forum section: Process Engineering Technology Exchange Area. Am I the moderator? Yes, I am the area leader. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the Process Engineering area: I should first listen to what everyone has to say. My experience on forums: I have served as a moderator in the sections dedicated to technical exchanges on basic chemical engineering theories, process and system design, production technologies, and safety engineering. Prior to this position, she was an overprint assistant in the utilities section. This post was last edited by hw197358 on 2009-4-17 14:18.]

Member name: bingyu252 Nickname: Volcanic Flame Position: Moderator for the Engineering Technology Exchange section, as well as the Pipeline and Valve Technology section; moderator for the Production Technology Exchange section. Sections in charge of: Engineering Technology Exchange section, Pipeline and Valve Technology section, Production Technology Exchange section. Is responsible as a moderator? Yes, for the Engineering Technology Exchange section and the Pipeline and Valve Technology section. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the Process Engineering section: Here are two immature suggestions. 1. The Process Engineering section is a quite large section, with a high number of posts posted every day. It has been observed that the moderators there are struggling to keep up, as there are too few moderators for such a high volume of posts. This was something that was clearly understood back when the section was first established; many moderators were hired, but it is still not enough. It is recommended that the new version focus on improving the evaluation of forum moderators, promptly bring in new members to assist with management, and replace those who are not competent as moderators! ! 2. Organize more events to encourage broad membership participation on a high-quality level; it shouldn’t be a superficial approach! ! Niuniu has done well these days; the quick-answer activity is very useful. However, the third session was a bit confusing, and it was also difficult for other moderators to participate in it. It is recommended to hold more such events! 3. It’s still a matter of moderators: moderators should be allocated reasonably across different forums, and more experts in technical discussions should be added. After all, it is the moderators who manage the forums, while it is the experts who are responsible for summarizing and standardizing the topics within those forums! ! Finally, I wish our community continued success! ! This post was last edited by bingyu252 on 2009-4-17 15:22.]

After a whole day spent conducting practical assessments for pressure vessel operators, I just got home and went online, where I found this newly updated post; I’m posting a reply to share this information! Member name: clguan Position: Technical discussant Forum: Project management Is responsible as an moderator: No Suggestions and opinions: 1. It is recommended to add more technical discussants or experts, as this will enhance the depth and standardization of discussions on technical issues ； 2. It is recommended to add a monthly thematic technical discussion session; however, questions should be collected beforehand to ensure that the discussions meet the needs of the majority of members. Personal advice, for reference only! Furthermore, I will, as always, support the work on the new super edition.

Member name: lxq700918 Position: Technical discussant Forum section: Production site section Is responsible as an moderator: No Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering section: 1. The process section covers basically all areas of the chemical industry, with a large number of posts posted daily; it can be said to be the largest section on the forum. Due to its broad scope, higher requirements are placed on moderators. However, \"there are specialized skills for specialized tasks\" – no matter how broad a moderator’s knowledge may be, there can still be a sense that different fields are as separate as mountains. Therefore, it is recommended to increase the number of moderators, technical experts, or technical discussants appropriately, to ease the burden on the existing moderators, and to allow more users to come to the discussion area for interaction, exchange, and learning. 2. Technical experts or discussion participants must possess solid professional knowledge; they should not only have unique insights into the technical issues discussed on the forum, but also promptly correct any incorrect statements to avoid misleading other users. Therefore, caution should be exercised when appointing or dismissing technical experts or discussants; avoid \"pseudo-experts\" and it is better to have fewer experts than poor ones. The above suggestions are not fully mature and are for reference only. At the same time, we must fully support the work on the new super edition!

Member name: zhangyong6404 Nickname: It’s not my fault. Position: Banzhu. Forum section in charge of: Chemical Engineering Fundamentals Discussion Area. Is the member a moderator? Yes. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the Process Engineering section: More technical experts should be added, as my knowledge is limited and I am unable to answer many questions on the forum.

Member name: david Li Xi; Nickname: Xiao D; Position: Moderator; Sections in charge of: Member sharing and upload area for process-related materials, Special section for exchanges on process engineering technologies, Temporary storage area for materials related to non-compliant process engineering practices. Is responsible as a moderator: Yes. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering section: 1. Increase the number of technical experts to improve the quality of technical discussion posts on the forum. 2. Improve the evaluation method for moderators, conducting a comprehensive assessment by combining evaluation data with the organization of the forums. There are no discussion posts in the upload areas I’m in charge of, so based solely on ratings or the number of times content has been managed, it’s not yet possible to meet the requirements for being an excellent moderator. This post was last edited by david Li Xi on 2009-4-18 10:40]

Member name: beileim1 Nickname: None Position: Moderator Forum section in charge: Pipeline and Valve Technology Exchange Area, Equipment Selection Technology Exchange Area Is responsible as a moderator: Yes Suggestions and opinions on the development of the Process Engineering area: Many discussion posts do not receive proper responses; it is recommended to add more technical experts with high expertise levels! This post was last edited by beileim1 on 2009-4-18 20:44]

Member name: wsl01218 Position: Senior Edition Assistant Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering area: 1. It is necessary to improve the evaluation of technical experts or those who participate in technical discussions, in order to enhance the quality of responses! 2. The evaluation of moderators needs to be strengthened; for those forums that remain unmanaged for long periods, the current moderators will be removed and replaced. 3. In cases where moderators fail to manage their forums properly due to an attempt to meet certain management quotas, or manage them in a chaotic manner, this should be taken into account in the monthly evaluations. 4. It is recommended to establish a section for monthly discussions and daily questions, in order to prevent the existing forums from becoming chaotic. This is for reference only. Full support for the work on the new super edition! This post was last edited by WSL01218 on 2009-4-18 14:25.]

Member name: COAT Nickname: None Position: Official Moderator Forum sections in charge: Member sharing and upload area for technical materials, Special area for exchanges on technical engineering, Standard learning material sharing area. Is responsible as a moderator? Yes. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the technical engineering section: 1. It is necessary to improve the quality of posts submitted by all members, and members who post high-quality content should be rewarded. 2. Boost member engagement to activate the entire platform and forum. 3. Improve the technical skills of experts.

Member name: chinazwr Nickname: Sea River Elder Position: Super Edition Assistant Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering area: Here are two immature suggestions. 1. It is recommended to strengthen the evaluation of moderators and improve the evaluation methods. There are a large number of posts in the craft-related sections; currently, many posts in some of these sections that should be rated often remain unrated for long periods of time. Moderators who fail to meet the requirements for management should be given warnings or even removed from their positions ； Moderators should carry out their management tasks as evenly as possible, avoiding situations where no management is done at all at times, and excessive management is carried out for short periods at other times. 2. It is a good idea to set up a separate column titled “Daily Question” in each forum section, as this helps to liven up the atmosphere of the forum. However, in the Pipeline Valves section, the “Daily Question” is placed in the technical discussion area for technical reasons, which results in confusion and makes the section look disorganized; I hardly want to check that section these days. I wish the Craft section, under the leadership of hw197358, prosperity and success, so that it can truly become the core section of the forum.

Member name: chping80 Position: Moderator Section in charge: Pipeline and Valve Technology section, as well as the section for technical exchanges on process and system design. Is responsible as moderator for: The section for technical exchanges on process and system design. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering section: After this section was reorganized, the scope of content covered by the section for technical exchanges on process and system design became much narrower; topics such as basic chemical engineering principles and equipment selection were moved to separate sections. As a core section of the forum, regarding breakthrough developments in process and system design, I believe it is necessary to increase the number of members managing this section!

Username: darliu Position: Technical Discussant Forum: Process Design Is responsible as moderator? No Suggestions and opinions: I’ve been quite busy with work lately; I’ll try to participate in discussions as much as possible.

Username: yxbj Position: Technical Discussant Forum: Project Management Is responsible as moderator? No Suggestions and opinions: 1. It is recommended to organize regular technical discussion sessions on a monthly or quarterly basis; the topics can be selected from those that generate lively discussions among members, or new topics can be proposed (it’s best to seek opinions from others before proposing such topics). Once the topic is elevated to an event theme, the original poster will receive a reward of 5 to 10 charms! 2. It is recommended to add a bonus component to the salaries of technical discussants. New members can gain prestige, but it’s difficult for those who engage in technical discussions to do so – which is quite disheartening for everyone :) 3. Please pay the salaries for March as soon as possible: lol 4. Wishing Deep Sea all the best on his journey; hope he returns soon: handshake 5. Welcome to the new super-version; I will, as always, support its development! This post was last edited by yxbj on 2009-4-20 08:29]

Member name: qq375170364 Nickname: Yiwaidu Position: Actual* moderator Forum section in charge of: Pipe and valve discussion area Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering section: I just became the actual* moderator of the pipe and valve section not long ago, hehe! ~It seems that posts related to the pipeline and valve area get the most views in almost every section, everyday! Maybe it’s related to Niuniu’s activities; its popularity has soared! There are many posts, and there are quite a few moderators. I feel that I don’t communicate as much with other moderators; it’s important for us to interact with each other, as this not only helps to share the workload but also enables better management of the forums.

Member name: huamei461112 Position: Moderator Sections in charge of: Storage and Transportation Engineering Technology Exchange Area, Project Management Engineering Technology Exchange Area, Process and System Design Technology Exchange Area Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering section: 1. The process section should organize more activities or provide incentives to encourage the creation and development of high-quality posts. Some moderators give insufficient ratings to the excellent replies posted by members, and ordinary members do not have the authority to rate them, which to some extent dampens the enthusiasm of those members who post outstanding replies. Therefore, it is recommended that moderators apply different ratings, and not assign a score of two or three points regardless of whether the post is good or whether it solves the problem. 2. Provide positive guidance to certain new members to help them get familiar with the forum’s procedures and rules as soon as possible. 3. Moderators should actively participate in the development of posts and answering questions based on their own skills, guiding members to provide positive and effective responses! …… Deep Ultra Edition, remember to come back and visit more often when you have time; you have a group of friends here. Good luck on your journey, buddy! This post was last edited by huamei461112 on 2009-4-20 20:13.]

Congratulations on the new super version! Member name: Xi Du Ouyang Feng. Role: Technical discussant. Forum section: Production site section. Is responsible as moderator? Yes (for the certificate and leisure area). Suggestions and opinions: The process section has always been HaiChuan’s strength; I really can’t think of any specific suggestions or opinions. I’ve been quite busy with work lately, and every time I come to Haichuan, I first finish my duties as a moderator before coming here to chat. Since there was little communication last month, I’m too embarrassed to accept the bonus! I’ll try to come and communicate with everyone in the future, after all, process technology is closely related to my work. Finally, I wish everyone success in their work and happiness in life! This post was last edited by Western Poison Ouyang Feng on 2009-4-20 21:29.]

Member name: Desert Poplar. Position: Moderator. Sections in charge of: Project management, production technology, information on non-compliant processes, Standards section. Responsible as a moderator: In some cases, yes; in others, no. Suggestions and views on the development of the process engineering area: None.

Congratulations on the new super version! Username: hcf Position: Technical Discussant Forum: Storage and Transportation Suggestions and opinions: Recently, my child has been busy with postgraduate program adjustments as well as job hunting; they are extremely busy and tired, so I can only find time to come here occasionally. Things should get better next month.

Member name: mfjxg Position: Technical Discussant Forum section: Process Engineering Technology Exchange Area Is the member a moderator? No Suggestions and opinions on the development of the Process Engineering area: There have been too many projects recently, leaving less time to visit Haichuan; I hope this forum will become increasingly popular.

I’ve been swamped with various tasks lately and on constant business trips; I’m back today to give a report! Member name: Beiming Yu. Role: Technical discussant. Forum section: Process design sub-forum. Is the member a moderator? No. Suggestions and opinions on the development of the process engineering area: It is hoped that thematic discussions can be organized regularly, with relatively generous rewards given to those who propose such topics.