It is recommended that the Wealth Center issue contribution-value red envelopes
Thread Content
Currently, the forum is in a turbulent state; to ease tensions and boost cohesion, it is suggested that the moderator of the cleaners section distribute bonus points.
The original poster is overreacting; where is there any talk of ‘turbulent conditions on the forum’? “The awarding of \"contributions\" is itself a rather special practice; it is intended mainly for VIP members, some forum veterans, and outstanding forum builders. It would not be appropriate to award them in the form of red envelopes – it is better for administrators to decide on such awards as appropriate.
If contributions can also be received as rewards, then what’s the difference from wealth? Contributions represent an acknowledgment by the forum’s management to members who have contributed to the development of the forum; it is a form of honor that cannot be obtained easily.
Reputation is already hard to attain, so the value of \"contributions\" is even greater; it is something that only members who have made significant contributions to the forum can earn. If bonus rewards for contributions are given, it will inevitably devalue such contributions.
The various rules and regulations of the forum should aim to minimize changes; any increase or alteration in the value of red envelopes inevitably leads to a lot of discussions. This adjustment in scoring system has drawn strong opinions from senior members, though most of them have chosen to remain silent. It might also cause some members to stop active participation or shift their attention to other forums. Therefore, it is not recommended that any new actions be taken by the Wealth Center!
I agree with the view from Building 2#; it’s not advisable to distribute \"contribution\" red envelopes.
No signs of instability in the situation; various scores are at different levels, and the distribution of red envelopes is not appropriate
I think the red envelope given every day is sufficient. It seems better to reduce it that much so as to facilitate upgrades; otherwise I’d be thinking about upgrading every day
There are some debates that can’t be called \"turbulent,\" and some opinions can’t be described as creating a \"tense atmosphere.\" The original poster is overreacting. Without debates in a forum, how can there be progress? Participate more and communicate more; the truth becomes clearer through discussion.
Support for the opinions of the Bincheng Watchers: Since it is called a contribution, that indicates the extent of one’s contribution to the forum