Why are companies reluctant to hire fresh graduates? ? ?
Thread Content
No work experience? Increase training costs? Poor manual skills? Dull? Unworldly? Does that mean experienced people are necessarily better at their work than fresh graduates? ? ? Who dares to answer “yes”? ? ?
Even if you know, don’t say it!~How embarrassing!~
Actually, fresh graduates also have their advantages; some companies are still willing to hire them
Each company recruits employees based on its own needs; state-owned enterprises too hire fresh graduates. What you say is too absolute
When companies recruit talent, they consider whether it is appropriate from the perspectives of the age structure and knowledge profile of their workforce; there are hardly any exceptions to this rule.
I heard that hiring fresh graduates can help avoid taxes (I’m not sure if this is true), so many large companies are also willing to do so
It sounds like a complaint post; I can only share my subjective opinion. First of all, among the points mentioned by the original poster, the first two are things that fresh graduates generally lack the most. As for the latter three points, they depend on the individual rather than whether they are fresh graduates or not. Next, let’s talk about the advantages of having experience: one can get started quickly, without the need for additional training resources, and can be put to use right away. Finally, there’s another very important factor – reputation. This is usually something that fresh graduates cannot rely on to overcome on their own; it is typically determined based on the employment performance of previous batches of fresh graduates
Different corporate cultures have different basic requirements for recruitment! Some companies need trained professionals, while others need adaptable individuals!
Fresh graduates have no experience! The advantage is the low salary, haha!
It’s not that having work experience is necessarily a good thing; rather, different organizations have different approaches to hiring. If an organization is in urgent need of staff, spending time training someone without experience is just a waste of time, and it doesn’t solve the problem. Besides, undergraduates really can’t do much in the workplace these days. It takes time to learn; don’t think you can do much right now. You won’t know whether you’re capable until you try, but don’t say that you can’t compete with others just because you lack experience – abilities are proven through one’s own efforts.
Indeed, there are those unfavorable factors you mentioned, but inexperienced newcomers have momentum and are able to identify new problems, unlike the more experienced individuals who stick to conventional approaches. Often, it is they who discover innovation. Generally, state-owned enterprises recruit a large number of new employees each year to **develop talent**, but the salaries, while stable, are not high. Private companies and private enterprises simply use high salaries to poach experienced talents from state-owned enterprises. Perhaps this is the pattern. :handshake
I’d say those with experience will definitely perform better than fresh graduates; if they don’t perform well, it’s still because they lack experience.
Stop complaining; companies certainly want employees who can be put to use right away. Moreover, many large companies place emphasis on employee development, and fresh graduates are more malleable
In fact, we all started as fresh graduates; it’s just that we took different paths. Some were easier, some were harder, and especially these days, most paths are quite difficult to follow. All you can do is keep looking; there are still places that hire fresh graduates. Complaining is useless – keep it up... :)
Is that even a question? Well, large companies are fine – they’re willing to invest capital. I work for a state-owned enterprise; I graduated a bit early
Well, generally speaking, state-owned enterprises still prefer to hire fresh graduates, as they aim to cultivate future talent. On the other hand, private enterprises prefer to recruit experienced individuals, hoping that they can contribute to the company’s success right from the start. So, there’s no need to talk about fresh graduates in this context – gold will always shine, but if everything around you is gold, then there’s no difference anymore!
There are many reasons, and one of the main ones is the inability to stay employed at one company. Once a company has trained you well, would it be happy if you just left without saying anything? Of course, many companies still hire fresh graduates; otherwise, where would fresh graduates get jobs? Companies value more that graduates work diligently for the company, rather than being fickle.
It depends on the industry the company is in. Generally speaking, in some emerging industries such as IT and telecommunications, recent graduates have no disadvantage, but in traditional industries such as machinery manufacturing, metallurgy, and building materials, experience does represent a weakness for them. After all, competition among companies is very fierce these days, and they all hope that the employees they hire can start contributing right away.
Although fresh graduates lack work experience, they have high malleability, compared to those with prior work experience!
Truly visionary companies with long-term plans will not fail to develop their own talent