My thoughts on ratings

Thread Content

  The vast majority of people here are leaders. Let me share my own opinions on the basis of respecting the opinions of leaders. The issue of grading involves a fundamental issue that needs to be clarified first.: What are we all doing in Shanghai?         Personally, I think it’s nothing more than the following points:: 1. Communication and learning * 2. Download shared materials 3. Take appropriate leisure when you have time 4. Satisfy your own vanity 5. Solve the unbearable pain of technical itch From these points, it basically illustrates the role and attraction of Haichuan Forum. Therefore, seeing the advantages of Haichuan, I am very nostalgic for Haichuan (Shanghai Chuan was recommended by our technical boss), which shows that he is also very optimistic about Haichuan. On this basis, I also mobilized CHANGJINGBAO The moderator came to our forum to be the moderator of the analysis technology section. In fact, he is also a moderator in other analysis forums and does a good job. Of course, there is also another moderator WOONTY who I am planning to recommend to the super version and Canghai moderators. All these explanations: Haichuan's tolerance.      Back to topic: After understanding what Haichuan does and the charm of Haichuan, how to retain talents? That is a fair and reasonable rating. I have carefully read the forum's rating rules and browsed the ratings of many sections. In fact, everyone can do this. More than 88% of the posts rated are very reasonable. Since others participate, they should be given appropriate compensation, because everyone values ​​Haichuan and posts. So I think there is no need to change the scoring rules because the scoring range given by the general moderator is very wide.   To sum up, it is: As long as you rate according to the big frame and others rate within the reasonable frame, then it is all reasonable.   (This is one of my previous posts) This post was last edited by lifanwang on 2009-4-20 12:15 ]