HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Which one is better, CAD or CAXA?

2009-05-11View Original

Thread Content

Nowadays, many people in the South use CAXA for drawing, which feels a bit awkward.* used. I have been using CAD for a long time and have not had much exposure to CAXA. What do you think of these two tools?
Reply #22009-05-11
Personally, I feel that there is not much difference between the two drawing softwares when drawing basic floor plans, and some of the commands are the same. Each has its own strengths. Generally speaking, CAD is more powerful, but CAXA is more in line with Chinese drawing in some aspects. * used. There are some standard libraries in CAXA that can be called when drawing mechanical drawings, which is very convenient.  
Reply #32009-05-11
CAXA must have its own characteristics to survive to this day. It mainly depends on your major. CAXA seems to focus more on mechanical majors.
Reply #42009-05-12
For mechanical drawings, CAXA is more convenient, but its versatility is not as good as AUTOCAD. Nowadays, AUTOCAD is very difficult to check, and many companies have switched to CAXA.
Reply #52009-05-12
The platform provided by CAD is relatively large. If you have complete library information, it will be convenient to use.; caxa’s library is self-contained, which is more practical and convenient.
Reply #62009-05-12
I feel like it’s okay to use CAD. Personally, I think it’ll be fine if it’s applicable.
Reply #72009-05-12
Everyone has their own strengths. CAXA’s post-processing function is better.
Reply #82009-05-22
I used to use CAXA, but now I use CAD. CAXA is a module developed from CAD and is biased towards drawing in the mechanical industry. However, CAXA's capture is not as good as CAXA's, but you can use some function keys to find the exact point to capture. CAD is a big platform. If you draw a lot, many things can be saved into blocks, and it is very convenient to call them up for use. Generally speaking, CAD is an aircraft carrier, and CAXA can only be regarded as a flagship. CAXA is convenient and easy to use, but CAD is more powerful. In particular, CAXA has developed to the 2007 version, which is closer to CAD. This version of CAXA realizes mutual conversion between multiple versions and CAD, solving the communication problem between CAXA and CAD. ………………
Reply #92009-05-22
cad2004 is easy to use, the reason is that you are familiar with it!
Reply #102009-05-22
Personally I think CAD is easy to use
Reply #112009-05-22
It should be said that each has its own expertise. It depends on where you use it.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.