Burnt tank + bed regeneration technology
Thread Content
Coking tank + complete regeneration of the bed layer technology: Those who have used this regeneration process, please share information on the capacity of the coking tank and the bed layer, as well as what proportion of coking each contributes Device scale?
Burnt tanks account for 80%, and regenerators account for 20% – these are the approximate figures in the design.
Due to its simple structure, flexible control options, high burning intensity, and efficiency, this regeneration method is now used in virtually all new installations.
This post was last edited by chengkang on 2009-11-20 at 14:34. Plant capacity: 1.2 million tons per year. Capacity of coking tanks: 30–50 tons. Capacity of regenerators: 60–90 tons. Designed coking ratio: 75–80% for coking tanks, 20–25% for regenerators. We hope you can provide specific figures.
The statements for the 2nd floor and the 4th floor are exactly opposite to each other, and it’s unclear which one is correct.
It mainly depends on the type of burning method they use, whether it is oxygen-deficient or oxygen-rich regeneration. So, both situations can occur.
““The designed coking ratio is 75–80% for the coking tank and 20–25% for the regenerator” is correct; the original statement “The designed coking ratio is 20–25% for the coking tank and 75–80% for the regenerator” was incorrect due to a lack of careful checking, which led to confusion. I’m sorry!