HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Seek a salary assessment system for fireworkers

2009-06-06View Original

Thread Content

Reward and Punishment Standards for Fire Regulators in the Coking Workshop (Revised) 1. For cases where the direct temperature exceeds 1430°C (3# > 1440°C), a fine of 50 yuan will be imposed for each batch processed. 2. For those with a straight-through temperature of >1400°C (3# >1420°C), a fine of 20 yuan will be imposed for each batch. 3. Temperature at straight-through
Reply #22009-06-06
Is the cause of charring necessarily related to the furnace temperature? Is fire adjustment also evaluated if it is caused by blocked coal conveyors or abnormal coal loading amounts? If coking occurs due to poor row alignment, then the row alignment coefficient for that furnace must be poor. Since a penalty has already been imposed for coking, would imposing an additional penalty for poor row alignment constitute double punishment?
Reply #32009-06-06
This post was last edited by Wulongdao on 2009-6-6 09:34. Regarding the determination of coke formation and the penalties for those responsible: 1. Coke formation is identified by the driver of the coke quenching vehicle, who then fills out a record and notifies the relevant person in charge responsible for adjusting the fire. The coke quenching vehicle driver records the detailed conditions of the raw coke after the current batch of coke is removed from the furnace and before the next batch is pushed out; he then notifies the relevant person in charge of fire adjustment before the third batch of coke is pushed out, after the current batch has been removed. The form is recorded: one copy is submitted to the coke oven workshop after work, and another is submitted to the dispatch department. The record sheet for the coke oven workshop must document the time of the scheduling inspection, the oven number, and the coke output. II. Determination of uncooked coke: When coke is discharged, if there is a coke cake with a brightness that is significantly reduced, a length of over 2 meters (excluding the furnace tip area), a height of more than 20 centimeters, or large amounts of smoke and intense flames rising above 5 meters above the furnace top, it is deemed to be uncooked coke. If the fire adjuster has objections, he may go together with the fire adjustment team leader and the on-duty shift supervisor to verify at the coke oven. If there are more than 2 pieces of black coke pieces with a diameter greater than 20 centimeters, it will be deemed as unripe coke. III. If the driver of the coking quenching vehicle provides inaccurate records or fails to convey information in a timely manner, a fine of 40 yuan will be imposed on that driver for each batch of coke produced, and a fine of 5 yuan will be imposed on the shift supervisor on duty for each batch. IV. For those identified as causing coke formation, a fine of 100 yuan shall be imposed on the responsible person in charge of adjusting the fire for each instance of coke formation. V. These provisions shall come into force as of September 5, 2007.
Reply #42009-06-06
I think this document ultimately rewards more.
Reply #52009-06-06
If the volatile content is too high, it should also be a matter of adjusting the fire. It is the penalty that accounts for the largest proportion, at least. Of course, the rewards are also the greatest.
Reply #62009-06-06
Who will supervise? The horizontal temperature is measured by adjusting the fire; if there is an assessment, will one fail if they measure it on their own?
Reply #72009-06-07
We are sampled by dispatchers and temperature monitors, but cheating is not ruled out in this process.
Reply #82009-06-07
A mix of rewards and punishments is needed to boost motivation
Reply #92009-06-07
An infrared thermometer, along with the accompanying software, allows for setting a password… which at least prevents access to the already recorded data.
Reply #102009-06-07
Another thing is that the coefficients need to be set reasonably – there should be a level of challenge, but they shouldn’t be excessively high; otherwise, workers will try every means to cheat, and it will become difficult to prevent that.
Reply #112009-06-07
(The Oolong Knife) They change the furnace numbers that do not meet the standards to those that do meet the standards for measurement – that’s too obvious... It’s necessary to make use of the supervision role of the staff in the top area of the furnace (with rewards for reporting such issues)... And if anyone does this, it will be evident from the temperature reports. Carefully examining the temperature reports is very useful; you can even determine which temperature readings are affected by the coal carts, as those values are not measured according to the standard parameters~

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.