Thread Content
Understanding the Q&A on oxygen production, as well as the principles of modern air separation technology and operation, is sufficient; add a bit of practice and reflection as well!
Congratulations, you have become an expert! !
I agree with the original poster’s opinion; however, I believe that a competent air separation process engineer must have knowledge of instruments and electrical systems, especially instruments
Agree with the opinion from the 3rd floor; those who understand manufacturing processes must have some basic knowledge of instruments. Those working with instruments should also have some knowledge of manufacturing processes, which is helpful for diagnosing and handling faults.
In fact, equipment management also includes an analysis course: failure modes, failure prevention, value engineering, and so on. So don’t think that thing is easy to create; it’s a common problem among Chinese people (my ancestors have been Chinese for 100 generations), so we can only imitate others’ appearances, some of their functions, and even understand the underlying principles ; And you can’t create things that are precise (materials, power equipment, etc.) ; Because you see the problem as simple.
I quite agree with what was said above. Everyone understands the principles behind things, but there’s a huge difference in the quality of the end results; it’s all down to the details that need to be handled well……
Apart from theoretical knowledge, on-the-ground experience is particularly important; don’t rely solely on theory
Learn more*, communicate more, observe more, and think more
Learning* changes destiny; knowledge shapes the future. Let’s work together to turn knowledge into productivity.
This post was last edited by chc1125 on 2009-7-13 08:07. In my opinion, China’s air separation technology is already at the international forefront; the main issue is that its power equipment is slightly inferior to that of some leading countries in this field, such as compressors and expanders. To operate these devices effectively, one needs to be willing to explore and take risks in practice. Of course, ensuring the safety of the equipment is the top priority – it’s about actually operating the equipment rather than just observing it. One must be brave enough to try new things; otherwise, there will be no progress. Understanding theoretical knowledge can help improve analytical skills, but what’s really important is taking action. If one is too cautious, no significant progress will be possible. Of course, it also depends on whether your boss trusts you – otherwise, be prepared to get fired, hehe
I agree with what was said above; although it seems like there aren’t many knowledge points to master, to truly become proficient one must combine that knowledge with practice.