HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

The old topic of cofferdams

2009-08-19View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by siena2008 on 2009-8-20 07:16. Since fire dikes are primarily designed for storage tanks containing flammable liquids, their application is quite specific; various standards specify that they are meant for storage tanks and flammable liquids. Cofferdams appear frequently in hydraulic engineering standards, while in the chemical industry they primarily serve a containment purpose, not limited to storage tanks. Do any of you experts know of any other codes besides the petrochemical codes, building codes, and design codes for fire dikes in tank areas?
Reply #22009-08-19
I’m not sure what your goal is; in which area?
Reply #32009-08-19
Prepare a cofferdam inspection form for our unit
Reply #42009-08-20
Our company’s cofferdam inspection tasks mainly involve checking whether the drainage valves are installed correctly and whether drainage is necessary; Of course, you can decide on the inspection items yourselves ;
Reply #52009-08-20
I wonder what the cofferdam at the poster’s workplace is used for?
Reply #62009-08-20
Article 2.0.11 of \"Equipment Layout for Process Installations\": Chemical hazard areas shall be designed with appropriate fire prevention, explosion protection, corrosion resistance, pressure relief, ventilation, temperature control, moisture prevention, and rain protection facilities based on the nature of the hazards present. Such areas should also be equipped with communication and alarm systems as well as protective equipment for workers. Cofferdams are required to a) be installed around areas of equipment that may be contaminated by oil, toxic substances, or corrosive materials during operation or maintenance. The equipment area for corrosive materials should also have an anti-corrosion floor covering. b) The height of the cofferdam should not be less than 150 mm. The scope of the cofferdam area is generally extended 0.8m outward from the maximum external dimensions of the equipment. c) The cofferdam should be equipped with drainage facilities, and the ground inside the cofferdam should slope toward these facilities, with a slope of not less than 3‰.
Reply #72009-08-21
This post was last edited by suhuoyi212 on 2009-8-21 at 20:44. The aim is to standardize the enclosures for temporary storage tanks used in production areas that are not tank storage areas, so as to create standardized enclosures. Since these tanks are designed specifically to collect daily leaks and spills in order to prevent pollution, fire dikes specified in petrochemical regulations are not applicable; moreover, it would be too difficult to use such regulations, as factors such as the spacing between tanks are not taken into account. I hadn’t been able to find the standards for cofferdams before; thanks to the person who shared this information. However, the standards on the upper floor mean that for our factory, the spacing between some tanks is insufficient; there might be a wall right next to them. Consider making corrections.
Reply #82009-08-22
I think cofferdams should mainly be installed in areas such as storage tanks, heat exchangers, heating furnaces, and towers.
Reply #92009-08-22
In industries like ours, the pharmaceutical sector, heat exchangers, heating furnaces, and similar devices are definitely necessary in the storage tank areas. Since these areas are located inside buildings that have 3 to 4 floors, it’s possible to use enclosures; however, having multiple such enclosures would result in something that resembles a secondary enclosure. Additionally, aesthetic considerations and space constraints must also be taken into account, which makes it unlikely that such a design will be approved. For now, they can only be used as temporary storage tanks for production purposes.
Reply #102009-10-27
I would like to ask the experts here: Is the cofferdam in the tank storage area designed in accordance with the requirements for fire dikes? It seems unnecessary, because I asked a colleague who works with equipment about this, and she said that large tanks containing acids or bases are less likely to explode; corrosion is more of an issue in such cases. Sometimes, when the valves fail, liquid may leak out in streams. But generally, unless subjected to extreme external forces, such tanks should not explode. Therefore, I think that if there’s enough space, it’s sufficient to place the acid and base tanks outside the explosion-hazard zone, and only a relatively low barrier needs to be constructed, without having to follow the requirements for firewalls. Of course, using a fire dike is safer, but it takes up a lot more space. What do everyone think? Looking forward to everyone's guidance
Reply #112009-10-29
Power plant storage tanks also require cofferdams, and workshop storage tanks have cofferdams as well, though on a smaller scale

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.