Thread Content
Dear experts, during the company’s assessment of regulatory compliance, we came across the rules for fire safety management in warehouses. Article 18 of these rules states that inventory items should be stored in categories and in separate stacks; each stack should cover an area of no more than 100 square meters. The distance between stacks should be at least 1 meter, the distance between stacks and walls should be at least 0.5 meters, the distance between stacks and beams or columns should be at least 0.3 meters, and the width of main passages should be at least 2 meters. Most of the items in the company’s current warehouse are not stored against the walls, and making changes in this regard would present considerable difficulties. I would like to ask everyone: is this regulation based on considerations related to the safety of the items or on the need for easy evacuation of people? How are all company warehouses implementing this rule?
This provision states that the area of each stack \"should not\" exceed 100 square units; it is not a strict requirement. There are minimum distance standards between stacks and between stacks and walls. These standards are set both in terms of the objects themselves and in terms of human factors. On the aspect of objects, it ensures their proper arrangement and the appropriate distance from the building, which helps to detect issues such as water stains inside the building and thus protect the objects. As for humans, there should be adequate passages for them to enter and conduct inspections easily.
This provision mainly specifies the minimum limits for various safety distances, which can be adjusted appropriately within the permitted range. In addition, certain special regulations must also be followed regarding the properties of the stored substances.
This post was last edited by siena2008 on 2009-8-20 at 14:42, and it is considered from the perspective of fire safety. The purpose of formulating this management rule is: “To strengthen fire safety management in warehouses and protect them from fire hazards.” As for your claim that this unit does not meet the basic requirements for setup, it is recommended to make the necessary corrections as soon as the conditions permit. If it’s not convenient to make adjustments temporarily, then strengthen management and focus on prevention. A look at the following will make clear its purpose: Chapter 1 General Provisions Article 1 These rules are formulated in order to strengthen fire safety management in warehouses and protect them from fire hazards, in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Fire Protection Regulations of the People’s Republic of China and their implementation details. Article 2: Fire safety in warehouses must adhere to the principle of \"prevention first, combined prevention and suppression,\" and follow the rule that those in charge are responsible. Warehouse fire safety is the responsibility of the entity itself and its superior supervisory authorities. Article 3: The implementation of these rules is under the supervision of the fire supervision agencies of public security organs at or above the county level. According to the Fire Protection Law, Chapter 1: General Provisions, Article 1: This Law is formulated in order to prevent fires and reduce the hazards caused by them, to strengthen emergency rescue efforts, to protect human life and property, and to maintain public safety. Article 2: Fire protection work shall adhere to the principle of giving priority to prevention and combining prevention with suppression. In accordance with the principles of **unified leadership, regulatory oversight by relevant departments in accordance with the law, full responsibility on the part of organizations, and active participation by citizens, a fire safety responsibility system shall be implemented to establish and improve a socialized fire protection network.
For warehouses, fire prevention is the main concern, and it should be considered from the perspective of the items stored there. Besides, this order comes from the Ministry of Public Security and should have been reviewed by experts.