Weld coefficient for precious metal containers
Thread Content
Should the weld coefficient for strength-controlled precious metal containers be given special consideration? For stainless steel containers, the wall thickness differs by nearly 15% when the weld coefficient is taken as 0.85 compared to 1.0, and the cost also differs by about 15%; with an additional 80% in lighting, it’s unclear how much the price difference is The quality should be more guaranteed. Has it been handled in this way?
You can decide for yourself; if you think that a price of 1.0 is cheaper than 0.85, then go with 1.0 – there’s no reason why not.
Precious metals? What kind of material? Not all welds can have a coefficient of 1.0; for example, Article 44 of the dimensional tolerance standards specifies coefficients for welds in non-ferrous metals, and there are also regulations regarding titanium in standard JB/T4745-2000
There are also some places where it’s not possible to shoot footage; using a 1.0 setting isn’t appropriate in such cases. Saving money shouldn’t be achieved by pursuing this approach. Other methods can be used, such as composite panels.
I understand that the weld coefficient represents the reliability of the welding process as perceived by the operator. A value of 1 indicates that there is little margin for error in that area; the welding quality must be ensured through 100% RT or UT testing. A value of 0.85 allows for a reduction in the proportion of non-destructive testing required, and these two values are related to each other in a balanced manner