Thread Content
This post was last edited by swwsdwf on 2009-10-13 at 18:26. In light of the current need to reduce energy consumption and emissions, a new type of energy-saving evaporation technology is presented here for reference in the industry dealing with non-thermosensitive inorganic salts. 1. Principle: Using coal or petroleum coke as an energy source, a boiler combined with multi-effect evaporation is employed; The difference is that the feed liquid is used in place of water to be heated in the furnace (sealing pot); the flue gas from the boiler flows through the tube side, while the feed liquid flows through the shell side. This heating system replaces the first-effect heater. The material inside the shell side of the furnace (sealing pot) is connected to the first-effect evaporation chamber, enabling forced circulation. The vapor generated in the first-effect evaporation chamber is used to heat the second-effect evaporation chamber, and by the same principle, this applies to multi-effect evaporation as well ; The shell side of the furnace (sealing pot) is under negative pressure, with the first-stage evaporation chamber connected to the second-stage heating chamber ; 2. This process is equipped with an automatic replenishment and discharge system for continuous evaporation ; The concentrated material can be discharged directly, while the crystallized material can be discharged from the crystallizer at high concentration ; 3. This technology can be adopted in areas where there is no heat source (no centralized heating, so a boiler must be installed) or where steam prices are high. Given that energy prices vary from region to region, I will not conduct cost calculations here; the energy-saving benefits are obvious.
Dear sea friends, if you think this technology is valuable, please upvote it[/color :handshake :victory:
I think this technology is feasible, and everyone should actively share their opinions.
We have developed a detailed process and engaged professionals to design it for the evaporation and concentration of calcium chloride; once successful, we may apply for a patent for this achievement
I think the investment required might be quite high. The profits from inorganic salts aren’t very good to begin with; although it saves energy, the initial cost of the equipment is too high. I don’t think it’s likely that people will be willing to adopt it. However, as a new energy-saving technology, it should be promoted vigorously.