Thread Content
This post was last edited by eleg on 2009-11-2 15:59. I just saw today that in the hidden danger investigation, someone wrote that [the electronic clock placed in the workshop does not meet the explosion-proof requirements] I have never heard of this, and I would like to hear your opinions.
This post was last edited by hkj0221 on 2009-10-14 16:41. I have never heard of this. Our explosion-proof workshop does have an electronic clock. If it does not meet the explosion-proof requirements, it must be removed. Thank you LZ for posting this topic.
Strictly speaking, the use of non-explosion-proof electronic clocks in explosion-proof areas is not allowed.
I couldn’t find the regulations. I personally think it’s not allowed.
Electronic clocks also use batteries. The main thing is that if the batteries are placed in an explosion-proof box, they should be fine.
Electronic clocks are not allowed to be placed in explosion-proof areas.
If it is not an explosion-proof electronic clock, it is not suitable because using dry batteries, even if the voltage is very low, sparks will still be generated.
Just to add: A large number of electrical instruments are used in the production process, and various frictional sparks, mechanical wear sparks, static sparks, high temperatures, etc. are inevitable, especially when instruments and electrical failures occur. Therefore, contacts with sparks must be equipped with flameproof enclosures, airtight enclosures or double the safety factor.
Strictly speaking, it is not allowed to have such a suggestion already made
Someone wrote [Electronic clocks placed in workshops do not meet explosion-proof requirements], well written! Many accidents are due to small omissions.
Electronic devices that generate sparks should not be placed in explosion-proof areas. There are so many electronic devices today that it is difficult to guard against them.