HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Difference between blasting purging and long purging

2009-10-24View Original

Thread Content

For pipes that have given consent, is it better to use 2.5MP burst purging or 2.5MP continuous purging? My question is this: since the overall pressure difference is 2.5 MP, which purge method will yield better results if steam consumption is not taken into account?
Reply #22009-10-24
The blasting purge is too intense; it is recommended to use a pressure-reduction method for purging, which allows the pressure to be increased to over 3.0 MPa. Attention should be paid to temperature changes – purging at 2.5 MPa actually constitutes a pressure-equalization method, with emphasis on the steam flow rate

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.