HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Our factory uses Texaco technology, and the hardness index of gray water is 1049. How can experts reduce it?

2009-11-21View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by xuqinger on 2009-11-21 10:03 Our factory uses Texaco technology, and the hardness index of gray water is 1049. How can experts reduce it? Supplement: Gray water hardness is the measurement result
Reply #22009-11-21
Is it a measurement result or a process indicator? Generally, the process indicators do not need to be changed, as long as they are controlled within the range. ; If the measurement results are like this, then the coal type must be considered (can it be changed? ), water quality (sewage discharge volume, wastewater circulation volume), etc., mainly through increasing water replenishment and improving drainage, gradually reducing the hardness of system water.
Reply #32009-11-21
The hardness index of gray water is 1049, isn’t it just right? Why adjust?
Reply #42009-11-22
There are dispersant pumps and flocculant pumps in the Texaco process. The operation of these two pumps is related to the water quality of the entire system, and these two pumps are one of the inspection items. You can also slowly change the water quality by increasing the amount of raw water, but it will take a long time.
Reply #52009-11-22
The best way is to increase the external drainage volume and add fresh water, which can reduce the hardness of gray water! 1409Can this water still be used? For us, over 400 feels quite high. Another option is to increase the dosage of dispersant and flocculant. Reduce solid matter in water!
Reply #62009-11-23
More than 1,000 is a bit too high. The person above is right. Generally, it is okay between 400 and 600. If it is higher, it will definitely affect the operation cycle of the entire system and increase the number of furnace preparations. In the current situation, the best way is to increase the water circulation volume, increase the external drainage volume, add fresh water, and add anti-scaling agents to reduce system scaling.
Reply #72009-11-23
This post was last posted by * ansheng edited on 2009-11-24 07:44 This kind of result is abnormal. If the analysis is correct, you should find problems in the operation. Is the amount of replacement water too small? ; Is the ash content of coal too high? Once the cause is found, all you need to do is treat it symptomatically. The first priority is to convert the water quality first to minimize the impact on equipment and pipelines.
Reply #82009-11-24
Is there any relationship between total hardness and flocculant addition amount?
Reply #92013-11-14
Personally I don't think it has much to do with it, please ask relevant experts to analyze it.~

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.