Urea granulation nozzle manufacturers
Thread Content
We are now planning to purchase urea granulation nozzles and brackets; could everyone recommend some manufacturers? Also, are nozzles produced by domestic manufacturers acceptable? Thank you
Tuttle abroad, the 11th Aerospace Institute in China.
It is understood that Jiangsu Linggu Large Fertilizer uses the nozzle granulation system developed by the 11th Aerospace Research Institute in China; the original poster might want to look into it.
Original poster, for the new urea production plant you’re setting up, what manufacturing process will be used? What is its production capacity (tons per day)? In China, the nozzles and driving mechanisms used in tower granulation are developed domestically; no one imports them. The nozzles with a capacity of 1620 tons per day and 1740 tons per day are mostly manufactured by the 11th Aerospace Research Institute, although some of these plants also use nozzles produced in Wenling, Zhejiang. It is recommended to choose driving mechanisms that are integrated with the nozzles, with each nozzle having its own cleaning tank to facilitate cleaning and replacement. Take a look at the nozzles used in those 1620 tons per day production units that were imported – it’s easy to replicate them, as the 11th Research Institute is capable of manufacturing them.
Thank you all; we are launching the new 3052 project.
In China, there are mainly: 11 (aerospace research institutes); one in Wenling, Zhejiang, and one in Baoding
Is the particle size of urea produced by the granulation nozzle uniform? Is particle size uniformity necessary for subsequent use?
There is also Baoji Jianguang Fluid Machinery Factory
Where did you build the new device? What stage are we at now?
Manufacturers in Wenling, Zhejiang, Aerospace Institute No. 11, Yankuang Luhua Maintenance Company, Wenling Granulator Research Institute, and others. The most commonly used ones are those from Wenling and the 11th Aerospace Research Institute.
Add Baoji Jianguang Fluid Equipment Factory, which we are already using