What tasks does everyone use PDMS for?
Thread Content
We use this for ventilation, supports, and pipeline layout. Is there anything else useful? Do you all think this image selection is accurate? Is it more convenient to draw directly using CAD, or is this one more convenient?
Why isn’t anyone responding? I’m also very curious about the functions of this software
Compared to CAD, this is more intuitive and makes it easier to detect issues such as pipe collisions during piping. PDMS is slower in the initial stages but faster for piping tasks later on, whereas CAD is faster at the beginning but slower for piping, annotation, and generating single-line diagrams. . . Each has its advantages and disadvantages, and the two complement each other. After all, PDMS represents three-dimensional piping systems, which is the trend in development; nowadays, most clients and construction companies require single-line diagrams. . . . Using PDMS is a faster method ；
CAD is faster and has an advantage when it comes to as-built drawings; minor changes can be saved directly. PDMS, on the other hand, offers greater accuracy and reduces the risk of collisions, but its use for as-built drawings can be problematic
Haha! For building a new workshop, we only needed CAD to get things done; however, the schematic diagram only shows the general layout, and actual construction on site is still required during the building process.
The analysis is quite accurate – each has its advantages as well as its disadvantages.
Yes, PDMS is more intuitive and helps avoid collisions; the material list is relatively accurate. However, making modifications to the floor plan can be a bit troublesome
Mm-hm. . Opinions on the spot are also important. . Do you use PDMS as well?
CAD is faster and has a significant advantage in as-built drawings
Mm-hm. . Agreed, it should be like that. . Each has its advantages