The most promising chemical products

This issue is too broad (or too complex) – a new product must take into account both technical and economic feasibility, as well as societal needs. Moreover, even mature technologies need to be continuously improved; otherwise they will be phased out. Given the significant gap in our technical capabilities, it is unlikely that a technological monopoly will arise; as a result, other forms of monopoly have emerged. Monopoly is the best way to ensure profits.

2# sunray619 makes a very good point. But it’s not limited to new products; even existing products are fine as long as they generate high profits. I’m not sure now whether it’s because I entered this industry at the wrong time or because there are issues with my analysis. How can one tell which products are not profitable? Is it really just a matter of time? It’s still **the problems on this side that have accumulated over time and have all erupted at this moment.**

Also, I’m interested in the monopolies other than those related to technology that you mentioned – are there any specific ones in mind? In today’s society, unless there are **mandatory regulations**, it is extremely difficult and impractical to try to prevent other competitors from entering a particular field. It’s all in writing, yet they still dare not act in accordance with the rules. There is too little integrity in society these days.

This post was last edited by zorro545 on 2009-12-29 at 14:39. It depends on the requirements. In China, many projects in this area focus on coal-based chemical manufacturing, but such processes are energy-intensive and cause significant pollution. The policy direction is also unclear. The production of polysilicon is also chaotic; there is no core technology involved, and everything is under foreign monopoly, which results in very low profits for local companies. Therefore, only with advanced technology can there be a market and profits

I work in the coal chemical industry, but when looking for a job, I found that no one needed someone like me who does research and experiments. The research institute either doesn’t hire anyone or hires very few, and with everything being handled internally, it’s difficult to get into the field. Engineering companies prefer those who are good at working with Aspen and have experience in engineering projects. Wait for **regulation? It’s been many years since we started working on upgrading our industrial structure, and we’ve been talking about the importance of the primary productive forces for ages. Yet those engaged in research don’t earn any money, and their work has no practical application. . . Everyone deceives one another, lacking a down-to-earth attitude. How much tuition must be paid each year to foreign countries in order to acquire new technologies and new processes? . .

Every word of the autumn wind makes sense, but in the face of **such policies, under such conditions. There are things one simply can’t help doing. Compared to interests, any sense of patriotism is worthless. This is the legendary economic society. It’s sad; I worked at an investment company for a year without finding any suitable chemical industry investment projects. It’s a disaster..

I don’t see anything to say; just do what needs to be done. No point in saying more.

The moderator’s words – is there more to them? I’ve become foolish. . .