HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Regarding the selection of mating flanges

2010-03-20View Original

Thread Content

I have a question for everyone: There is a furnace used in catalysis; it was originally equipped with an access hatch made of 16Mn material, with an outer diameter of 732 mm and a thickness of 16 mm. There is also an insulating lining inside the flange. Now I want to remove the access hatch cover and install a flange in its place. The thermal engineering team has specified a temperature of around 650 degrees and a pressure of 0.3 MPa. I would like to ask everyone how I should select the appropriate flange for this purpose 1. I originally wanted to cut off the existing flange and install a new pair of DN700 flanges – would 304 work? Another issue is that the original flange used JB4700 standards, with an inner diameter of 700; the 650-degree temperature standard no longer applies in this case. The standard outer diameter for use in the chemical industry is 720 – can it be welded directly using PL? 2. I asked the workshop yesterday; they said that since the original flange cannot be moved, it’s necessary to use one that can withstand high temperatures. One of these flanges is made of low-alloy steel, and the other from high-alloy steel. Won’t the sealing performance of these two types of flanges be poor? It also deforms easily?
Reply #22010-03-20
In my opinion, if the mating flanges are not lined, and a high-temperature-resistant superalloy stainless steel flange is connected to a low-alloy steel flange, the operating temperature of the 16Mn flange, due to heat transfer, should be relatively high. The operating temperature for low-alloy steel is generally required to be below 425°C; above this temperature, the cementite in the steel undergoes graphitization, which ultimately leads to a reduction in the strength and ductility of 16Mn flanges, resulting in deformation and other issues. . . .
Reply #32010-03-21
If a complete redesign is needed, can 304 material be used?
Reply #42010-03-21
4# Grace 304 is certainly an option, but it’s quite expensive. I recommend using 12Cr1MoV, as its temperature properties are just right
Reply #52010-03-22
I checked, and the maximum heat resistance temperature of 12Cr1MoV is less than 600 degrees

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.