For this year’s design review exam in Jiangsu Province, (the shortest length of the tube section should not be less than 300 mm. Why? Compiled by Realben)
Thread Content
This post was last edited by realben on 2010-7-30 at 16:55. The questions in the Jiangsu Province design assessment exam at the end of March this time were really tricky; they seemed to cover knowledge from obscure areas. Questions appeared regarding the flange calculation formulas in GB150, as well as calculation formulas related to towers. During the defense session, a question was raised about the requirement that the shortest length of a section in GB150 be 300 mm, but it was mentioned that the length of sections in heat exchanger tube boxes can be less than 300 mm; an explanation of the difference between these two was requested. In a word, this year’s topic is too obscure. After the exam, I overheard people talking; a man in his early fifties said that their factory had never manufactured any tower equipment at all, which was extremely frustrating. Many factories focus on producing just one type of product, which is not advantageous; in the future, it’s better to explore various areas. Standards such as GB150 and GB151 should be studied carefully, especially those that are not used very often.
Does the province have the authority to conduct qualification exams for examiners?
Well, I participated in the D1D2 category
To qualify for examination, one needs to have a broad range of knowledge; at least, one must be familiar with these relevant standards. Not only design skills are required, but also an understanding of materials, mechanics, various manufacturing processes, and inspection methods, along with some practical experience. The theoretical exam should be relatively easy, while the exam involving the review of drawings is more difficult, as you don’t know what types of equipment you’ll encounter nor what kind of examiners you’ll face; they might be specialists in mechanics, manufacturing, or standard-setting, and the questions they ask can be quite varied.
We only use one aspect of Ah
It is correct that those qualified for design review should have a more comprehensive range of knowledge.
The requirements are correct, but for those who apply them in practice, it poses a big problem; it may also suppress many talented individuals
Well, the teacher who asked the question must be quite talented
Yes, a theoretical exam requires a broad range of knowledge, and some of that knowledge is easier to grasp when one is exposed to it on a regular basis.
It’s so hard, bro. How did you answer it?