Does this precaution make sense?
Thread Content
A worker in our company fainted due to physical reasons when he returned to the locker room after finishing his work. The back of his head hit the ground (cement floor), causing a crack in his head and requiring more than 10 stitches. In the "precautionary measures" of the accident report, the department said, "When you faint, try to move your body forward to prevent the back of your head from hitting the ground." As soon as the report came out, public opinion was in an uproar. They all thought that when you fainted, you had lost consciousness, and you couldn't care less about falling forward. It was really funny. Let’s discuss whether this precautionary measure is meaningful?
It must be meaningless. What if the center of gravity hits the forehead and breaks it?
This is not a fall but a faint, so the formula of "try to move your body forward to prevent the back of your head from hitting the ground" is meaningless. Personally, I feel that to prevent this kind of thing, we should mainly find out why the worker fainted. Is it a problem with his physical fitness or a problem with his position or work? Then formulate corresponding preventive measures.
Might as well write a measure "No Fainting".
Could you please tell me about the industry you are engaged in? Is it foreign investment? joint venture? . . . Haichuan has an interesting story from now on. . . Ha ha ha ha
So talented, it would make sense if there was no rule against passing out.
What the notice said should not be classified as preventive measures. It would be better to put this item in the safety reminder.
It would be more meaningful if you try to keep the person leaning forward when you feel dizzy.