HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

What are each party’s plans?

2010-05-18View Original

Thread Content

This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:13. It is said that the new sulfur dioxide emission standards will be fully implemented in 2014, with the sulfur dioxide emission concentration to be reduced from the current 960 milligrams per cubic meter to 500 milligrams per cubic meter. What are everyone’s plans? Can the existing facilities meet these standards? If not, what methods are planned to be used for upgrades?
Reply #22010-05-18
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:14. 1# cenzh008864: The original poster really had foresight! That would make things even worse for our company; we only have a Level 3 Claus unit, and the exhaust emissions are already not up to standard. It needs to be considered in advance! Experts, please share some advice!
Reply #32010-05-18
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:14. No way – we’ve always had values around 500. If that’s the case, our factory will be ruined; in such a situation, we’ll have no choice but to use new catalysts!
Reply #42010-05-18
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:14. Your metrics are too high; no wonder the environment is getting worse! ^_^ We have always been controlling it at 280! It is completely possible to meet the standards
Reply #52010-05-18
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:15. Our online measurements show levels of 20–30 ppm, and the environmental protection tests also show values below 100 mg/m3.
Reply #62010-05-24
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:15. If this is actually put into practice, it will cause a lot of problems; but it seems that this is the way it has to be. The sulfur concentration in my residential area is 10 – I’m not sure what unit that represents. The carbon dioxide level reads 47; I hope it’s at the PPB level.
Reply #72010-05-30
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:15. No problem – just add air to it directly.
Reply #82010-05-30
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:16. We use the Super Claus process: three stages of the Claus process followed by one stage of Super Claus, after which the gas is sent to an incinerator for combustion before being released; the sulfur dioxide content in the exhaust gases is less than 330 ppm.
Reply #92010-06-24
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:16. The method you mentioned on floor 7 won’t work anymore; the new standards impose restrictions on the oxygen concentration in exhaust gases.
Reply #102010-06-24
This post was last edited by adsl121 on 2010-6-25 01:16. Once the standards are established, they will surely apply to newly installed devices; old devices will continue to use the old methods. Foreign companies have already begun researching CO2 removal from flue gas
Reply #112010-06-25
Reply to 7# superclaus-user: You’re just deceiving yourself. How can you protect our environment, and how can you leave a world of clear waters and blue skies for future generations?

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.