Discussions about PVdesktop
Thread Content
Is there any, or how many still use only this software? I feel there are many problems during use. Moreover, it is not fully developed yet, and there are things that cannot be calculated. Such a poor-quality software being sold at such a high price – I strongly protest!
It’s a common problem with domestic software, but it’s at least better than SW6.
1. The Xtreme Toolkit Library DLL is used, resulting in a mix of Chinese and English text. 2. The menu items sometimes move around randomly and cannot be clicked. 3. Even when the calculation is correct after an earlier error, a red warning appears; the program must be closed first. 4. The material of the reinforcement rings cannot be automatically set to match that of the cylinder or the head. 5. For towers, the reinforcement rings at the openings cannot be deleted; setting the thickness of these rings to 0 results in an error message stating “Effective thickness of reinforcement ring δer = -0.300”. 6. Why can only one head be inserted for each segment of the tower? See C-102 7.C-201 Tower equipment flanges. Warning: The minimum bolt spacing does not meet the requirements, but the calculation results do not include any information regarding the minimum bolt spacing ； According to GB150, page 95, the requirement is actually met. 8. The external load on the equipment flange cannot be used to confirm the entry; a number between 0 and 10000000000000 must be entered
When calculating the silo, it keeps saying that \"the nominal thickness of the hopper material is out of range\", and once the thickness is changed, the program shuts down automatically
Few people use this software, there are also few discussions about it online, and the software itself is not well-made
Every software has its advantages and disadvantages; it depends mainly on the software’s framework and whether its development can receive support.
Personally, I think it’s more user-friendly than SW6. Just adding words to meet the character count requirement
The software is quite user-friendly, but it’s full of errors; well, it’s still better than having to type by hand.
Can this software be used to calculate desulfurization towers without skirt bases?
Well, there are quite a few issues; that diagram is completely useless. It’s better to focus on developing the calculation program properly to ensure accuracy.
The company purchased this calculation software and has been using it; it calculates a bit more data than SW6, but it also has many problems. Sometimes the results produced by these two software programs do not match.