HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

Issue with the diameter of armored thermocouples

2010-06-17View Original

Thread Content

I would like to ask everyone: can a φ4 armored K-type thermocouple withstand a temperature of 1200 degrees? Is it acceptable for a casing with an outer protective sleeve to have a wall thickness of only 3 times that of normal casings, when operating under a pressure of over 30 kilograms and at a temperature of 1200 degrees?
Reply #22010-06-17
Just based on temperature alone, it’s certain that it won’t pass; K-type thermocouples are generally suitable for temperatures up to around 1000 degrees. Besides, with such high pressure, even a thin wall thickness can cause problems. One also needs to pay attention to the composition of the medium, as well as its permeability and corrosiveness
Reply #32010-06-17
I don’t think it will work; it’s too thin, with high temperature and high pressure.
Reply #42010-06-18
It’s not possible; for temperature measurement, S or B type noble metal thermocouples should be used, and the material of the casing must be chosen based on the process medium.
Reply #52010-06-18
Absolutely not, unless you want to cause an accident
Reply #62010-06-18
For a K-type, 1200 is required – that’s not feasible. Even with 3 layers of thickness, a pressure of 30 kilograms is still not realistic! !
Reply #72010-06-18
We also thought it wouldn’t work, but the manager said that they referred to the casing used at the same location at Yuntianhua, which is only 3 inches thick, and claimed there’s no problem with that The casing material is GH3039
Reply #82010-06-26
It seems to be designed by Wuhuan Institute; the thermocouples inside the vaporization furnace
Reply #92010-06-26
The wall thickness of the thermocouple sheath for high temperature and high pressure must be at least 3 times that thickness; it’s not sufficient to be only 3 times thick.
Reply #102010-06-26
I don’t think it will work; the wall is too thin.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.