HCBBS Forum (English)
Submit Chemical Projects / Find Solutions
Amplify Your Requirements on a Broader Chemical Platform *Engineering · Technology · Equipment · Solutions*
Submit Request

It is said that pulsed electrocoagulation technology is good; I wonder about its actual value?

2010-06-20View Original

Thread Content

It is said that pulsed electrocoagulation technology is good; I wonder about its actual value?
Reply #22010-06-21
Many new technologies are good, but it seems that I haven’t really been able to identify exactly what’s good about them or to what extent they’re good; today’s “new” technologies remain quite mysterious.
Reply #32010-06-21
It is the electrocoagulation technique, only with pulse power technology being used. In my opinion, electrocoagulation is not some highly sophisticated technology (I work with this technology as well); what really matters is whether the design of the electrocoagulation reactor is reasonable. Otherwise, this technology doesn’t have much competitiveness – just giving it a more catchy name doesn’t make it more effective.
Reply #42010-06-23
Why can’t this technology be widely adopted? It’s not even as widely used as the electrolysis method
Reply #52010-07-07
It seems that this technology has a very limited range of applications, and netizens don’t pay much attention to it either
Reply #62010-07-07
I’ve been in contact with it, but I find it pretty mysterious; it’s not as reliable as potions
Reply #72010-07-07
Reply to 4# cooker123: I’m not sure what you mean by electrolysis Iron-carbon microelectrolysis? This application isn’t widely used either, and it can only be applied in certain specific industries and water types. A major reason why electrocoagulation is not widely adopted is the relatively high operating costs, along with people’s lack of awareness. Actually, micro-electrolysis also has quite a few problems, such as plate buildup, and its operating costs are not low either.
Reply #82010-07-10
It’s not micro-electrolysis; it’s just that the power supply operates in a pulsed manner
Reply #92010-07-10
Reply to 8# cooker123: It’s still electrocoagulation, only with pulse power technology used; it’s just a different name for the same thing. In fact, high-power pulse power supplies are not cheap either, but their lifespan is not as good as that of linear power supplies. When it comes to power supply efficiency, it depends not only on the type of power supply but also on the design of the circuits used for voltage transformation and current regulation. Therefore, whether it’s pulses or anything else, the key to electrocoagulation technology lies in the design of the electrolytic reactor. In fact, many foreign electrocoagulation systems integrate the power supply (which they call rectifiers) directly into the reactor; only on a large scale is a separate power supply used.

Submit a Project

**Looking for Chemical Technology, Equipment & Solutions?** No Registration Required Broader Platform Exposure | Global Chemical Service Provider Connections

Submit Request — Free Consultation

Disclaimer

This is an automated machine translation of the original thread. Some technical terms may have inaccuracies; the original text shall prevail. Click "View Original" at the top right to access the source page, which supports IP-based automatic real-time language translation. Please watch out for contact details and sales inducements to prevent fraud. All content and translations are for reference only, representing solely the poster's personal views. For enquiries, email service@hcbbs.com.