Thread Content
Everyone, what do you think of the prospects for projects that use coke oven gas to produce methanol? Is pollution a significant issue in such projects? I’d really like to know more about this. Thanks---
Our factory uses a non-catalytic conversion process, which essentially results in a garden-like facility with almost zero pollution. It is mainly restricted by the coking process earlier on, preventing full-capacity production.
Hello, fellow sea enthusiasts! I’m looking for some literature on this topic! Please take care: handshake
Non-catalytic conversion means that methane is not converted, as the converter is not equipped with a catalyst!
Reply to 4#: It can be argued that in non-catalytic conversion, methane is not converted; rather, the conversion takes place without the use of a catalyst, at higher reaction temperatures. This requires more stringent materials for the equipment. The advantage is that there are no requirements regarding the sulfur content in the coke oven gas fed into the conversion furnace, and there is no risk of catalyst poisoning, allowing for broader reaction conditions.
Overall, methanol production from coke oven gas results in very low levels of pollution. The main limitation lies in the coke production process; as long as this process is managed properly to ensure stable operation and proper storage of methanol, pollution can be avoided. Methanol production from coke oven gas represents an extension of the coking industry chain and is an energy-saving approach.
Non-catalytic conversion is a type of conversion reaction that takes place in the absence of a catalyst. Its advantage is that there are no requirements regarding the sulfur content in the coke oven gas fed into the conversion furnace; it is not susceptible to catalyst poisoning, and the reaction conditions are flexible. Conversion technologies include catalytic partial oxidation, uncatalytic partial oxidation, and steam conversion.
The one on top. . . . . . . .